Category Archives: Military News

Minimal Support for ‘Pay Troops First’ Bill

The other day I wrote about this bill that was presented in Congress to make sure soldiers still get paid, even if the Budget deal is not reached by August 2nd.

Well it is not looking to good because only nine members of Congress have signed on to support it.

Two weeks after a Texas congressman tried force a House vote on his bill mandating that servicemembers be paid first in the event of a government shutdown, only nine representatives have signed on.

The so-called discharge petition requires 218 signatures.

Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, filed the bill in March only to see it stuck in committee.  During a press conference on July 14 he announced he would use a House rule that allowed members to petition to get a bill onto the floor.  At that time he expressed confidence that he’d have the backing, claiming he had 190 co-sponsors.

“We need to make sure the military, people in harm’s way that are dodging bullets, never have to have it cross their minds that their paychecks may not come in,” Gohmert said at the time. He was joined there by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, who had filed similar legislation in the Senate, where it has also languished in committee.

This is pretty important and a time for the American people to contact their Representatives and Senators and let them know that this needs to be dealt with.

Pay for servicemembers – as well as checks for disabled veterans and retirees – is at risk if Congress does not raise the debt ceiling beyond the $14.3 trillion now allowed by law. The White House has said it cannot promise that these and other obligations, including Social Security, will be met if the debt ceiling is not raised by Aug. 2.

Hutchison, speaking Tuesday on the Senate floor, urged Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, to allow her bill to come up for a vote.

“We have people in the military with boots on the ground by the thousands that are making under $20,000 a year,” she said. “Those are people who are living paycheck-to-paycheck.  They don’t have the luxury of having a big savings account.”

Like I said, there are only a few who have signed on to support this. If your representative is not listed here, then you know what you have to do.

In addition to Gohmert, only a handful of lawmakers – all Republican – had signed the petition to date. The other representatives are Michael C. Burgess of Texas, Steve King of Iowa, Bill Posey of Fla., Sue Wilkins Myrick of North Carolina, André Carson and Mike Pence of Indiana, Trent Franks of Arizona, and Tim Scott of South Carolina.

Military Retirement Changes

According to the Star and Stripes, military members may no longer be able to receive retirements after 20 years of service. This move is in response to the government’s inability to balance its budget and the mandate to shave $400 billion from the defense budget.

The plan calls for a corporate-style benefits program that would contribute money to troops’ retirement savings account rather than the promise of a future monthly pension, according to a new proposal from an influential Pentagon advisory board.

The yearly contributions might amount to about 16.5 percent of a member’s annual pay and would be deposited into a mandatory version of the Thrift Savings Plan, the military’s existing 401(k)-style account that now does not include government matching contributions, according to the Times.

While I’m in favor of Soldiers being able to contribute to a pension plan, using benefits of troops dying and losing limbs for their country isn’t the way to begin the cost-cutting discussion. There is already so many rules and regulations that prevent the military from saving money on simple purchases like daily supplies. Supply NCOs are unable to shop around for the best price on paper, pens, cords, CD-Rs, etc. Instead, regulations require us to spend upwards of 150% more on a product from an “approved” source, usually the Lighthouse for the Blind.

A perfect example of this is CD-R. The cheapest price my supply sergeant will pay for a spindle of 100 CD-R (silver top, no branding) is about $33. If I went down to the local Staples, I could get the exact same thing for $12.99. By law, I have to pay $254% more for the same product. This happens all over. We pay $.27 for a pencil we can get for a penny. We pay $39.99 for a 4GB thumb drive we can get for $5.99.

This isn’t a military phenomenon. It’s a federal government phenomenon. By law, the United States taxpayer pays 2,3,4 times more for virtually everything it buys. For software and equipment fielding, we are required to use small businesses. We can’t go to Apple, Google, HP, etc with a list of requirements for running a TOC and ask them to create something. We’re spending billions of dollars on the DCGS-A platform that is meant to accrue intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance, and provide real-time battlefield analysis and the current location of high-value targets. We’ve spend $2.7 billion on this system AND IT DOESN’T WORK like it’s supposed to.

If we really want to save money in the defense budget, we need to stop wasting money on military contracts that cost millions and billions more than necessary. I don’t even want to know how much could be saved if we reverted the protection of our military bases back into military hands. Currently, most military bases use contractors to serve a security personnel manning the gates and patrolling the streets. While many of these people are former military themselves, I’m sure the cost is much greater than putting some Soldiers at those gates. I like to think that a Soldier would take greater interest in protecting their base.

Everyone who knows me knows that I’m all about finding ways to save taxpayers money. And, to an extent, I have no problem with Soldiers pitching in a little financially to pay for their retirements. In our business, which is unlike any other business within the federal government, we are called up on to kill or be killed. The job hazards cannot be matched in the civilian world or any other federal agency. For that reason alone, I oppose completely getting rid of the retirement system.

20 years is a lot of time to commit to dangerous work. In most professions, 20 years would come and go and wouldn’t seem like much. It’s like Groundhog Day. There’s no blood, sweat or tears that “paid” for that retirement. Not so with our troops. I would use this same argument for the nation’s police forces. After 20 years of putting your life on the line, these guys deserve a retirement.

Of course, this idea to make Soldiers pay for their retirement isn’t a new one resulting from the budget problems the federal government currently faces. This was the plan of the current administration from day 1. After taking office, President Obama angered veterans groups by pushing to charge private insurers for service-related injuries or disabilities. I even specifically asked about this misguided policy when I and a few other milbloggers met with members of his cabinet in the Roosevelt Room back in March 2009. Of course, I magically received an IG complaint from DA shortly after that in which complaints were made about comments I wrote on my blog.

Let me leave you with some words from President Lincoln’s second inaugural address:

With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.

The fundamentals of that statement haven’t changed, especially considering that our troops are still fighting two wars, with some coming home in boxes on a daily basis. Now to be fair, I don’t think it would be uhfair to ask troops to pay about 5% into their retirement accounts. That would give us some “skin in the game.” But, I’ll tell you what. Treating MILITARY pay this way should be the LAST option for the federal government. Start with Congress first, move through the other federal agencies, THEN start charging those who sacrifice so much for their country!

Tonight on Episode 150 of You Served Radio

Tonight we will be talking SFC Leroy Petry receiving the Medal of Honor, Mila Kunis, current politics, Karzai’s brother and a multitude of other topics.

In addition to all of that we will have SFC Jason Bishop from 10th SF Group on to talk about how he was recently accused by an over-zealous District Attorney on multiple gun charges after he stepped in to help save some innocent people from being killed or injured by gang-bangers. SFC Bishop is a highly qualified Green Beret Medic who was wrongly accused and threatened with significant jail time after he stepped up to help ensure safety for his neighborhood.

The charges were dropped after several innocent people he helped safeguard stepped up and made their voices heard about how he was not in the wrong.

Jason will be on to tell us the entire story and how even though he is now cleared, the impact it had and still has on his life.

 

House Approves Defense Spending Bill

After three days of debate, the House passed a $649.2 billion defense spending bill (H.R. 2219) for fiscal 2012. The bill passed 336-87.

The bill would provide $530.5 billion for the Pentagon, $8.9 billion less than President Obama requested but $17 billion more than fiscal 2011 levels. It also includes $118.7 billion for ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, which is approximately $40 billion less than current funding.

The bill provides:

  • Funding for a 1.6 percent military pay raise
  • $32.2 billion for the Defense Health Program
  • $5.9 billion to purchase 32 F-35 jets but includes no money for an alternate engine
  • $453 million for production of the M1A2 SEP Abrams tank. Members rejected White House efforts to temporarily cease production of the tank and provided $272 million more than Obama requested.
  • Approximately $10 billion for missile defense programs

An amendment that would prohibit prisoners currently held at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, from being transferred to the United States was adopted as well as one that would prohibit the use of funds to implement a training curriculum for military chaplains related to the repeal of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.

The House also adopted a series of amendments aimed at boosting spending for research on post-traumatic stress disorder, traumatic brain injury, prostate cancer and illnesses affecting veterans of the first Gulf War.

Next Action: The Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee is still holding hearings related to their version of the defense spending bill. Because the Senate has not adopted a fiscal 2012 budget resolution that would set top-line spending limits, most of their work will remain on hold.

Photo of the Day – The Silver Star

The Silver Star is the third highest medal for valor any service member can receive during combat. In 1932, it replaced the Citation Star and “is awarded to a person who…is cited for gallantry in action against an enemy of the United States while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing foreign force, or while serving with friendly foreign forces engaged in an armed conflict against an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party. The required gallantry, while of lesser degree than that required for the Distinguished Service Cross, must nevertheless have been performed with marked distinction.”

In today’s photo by Gunnery Sgt. David G. Smith, U.S. Marine Col. David W. Coffman, commanding officer of the 13th Marine Expeditionary Unit, pins the Silver Star onto Sgt. Franklin M. Simmons, Force Reconnaissance Platoon, 13th Marine Expeditionary Unit, during a ceremony held in the hangar bay of amphibious assault ship USS Boxer (LHD 4) on July 4. The 13th MEU is deployed with Boxer Amphibious Ready Group as the U.S. Central Command theater reserve force, also providing support for maritime security operations and theater security cooperation efforts in the U.S. 5th Fleet area of responsibility.

Simmons will be awarded the Silver Star for heroic actions during Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, Aug. 8, 2008.

Citation: For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity in action against the enemy while serving as Assistant Team Leader and Designated Marksman, Team 3, Force Reconnaissance Platoon, 2d Battalion, 7th Marine Regiment, Marine Corps Forces Central Command (Forward) on 8 August 2008 in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM. Conducting clearing operations in the village of Shewan in Farah province, Afghanistan, Corporal Simmons’ platoon was ambushed by a numerically superior enemy force. Volleys of intense rocket propelled grenade and machine gun fire disabled one of the platoon’s vehicles and trapped several Marines in the kill zone. Without regard for his own safety, Corporal Simmons exposed himself to intense enemy rocket propelled grenade and machine gun fire as he crawled to the top of a berm to locate targets for his Mark 11 sniper rifle. He resolutely ignored enemy machine gun rounds impacting within a foot of his position as he calmly employed his weapon to kill the enemy firing at his fellow Marines in the kill zone. Remaining in this exposed position to get the necessary observation of his targets, he killed an estimated 18 enemy fighters and wounded at least two others. Corporal Simmons’ devastating fires during an eight hour battle in oppressive heat were critical in saving the lives of his fellow Marines. By his extraordinary marksmanship, courageous actions, and exceptional dedication to duty, Corporal Simmons reflected great credit upon himself and upheld the highest traditions of the Marine Corps and the United States Naval Service.

Photo of the Day – Red, White and True

While most Americans were celebrating Independence Day with BBQs, time with family, parades, and fireworks, a few American patriots that protect those liberties recommitted themselves to serving as the sheepdogs responsible for securing and ensuring that way of life.

235 U.S. service members from all branches of service reenlisted today during a ceremony called “Operation Enduring Commitment – The Red, White and True” at Kandahar Airfield in Afghanistan. One Soldier for every year since the signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776. On hand for the ceremony was U.S. Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, commanding general of the NATO International Security Assistance Force and U.S. Forces Afghanistan. In this photo, General Petraeus smiles for a photo with U.S. Army Spc. Don Ellen after administering the oath of re-affirmation and re-enlistment. As you know, General Petraeus served as the Commanding General of the 101st Airborne Division in Iraq during Operation Iraqi Freedom 1. Both Soldiers are sporting the unit patch in this photo by Lt. JG. Haraz Ghanbari.

Secretary Gates Farewell

Secretary Gates was awarded the Medal of Freedom by President Obama as part of a send-off for his term as Defense Secretary in a ceremony at the Pentagon today. Here is the Transcript of the president’s words at the ceremony.

Thank you very much. Admiral Mullen, thank you for your eloquent words, but also for your extraordinary service. As you near a well-deserved retirement, thank you for four decades of incredible service — to you and Deborah.

Members of Congress, Vice President Biden, Deputy Secretary Lynn, members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, service secretaries and distinguished guests, men and women of the finest military in the world, and, most of all, Secretary Gates, Becky, Brad, and although she could not be here, I also want to acknowledge your daughter Eleanor.

When I took office, Bob Gates had already served under seven Presidents during an illustrious career that spanned four decades. He would have been forgiven if he had opted for a private life of comfort and ease. He had earned it. And when asked by a reporter whether he might stay on to serve an eighth President, he offered the answer — “inconceivable.” (Laughter.)
Why did he stay? I know there are days when Bob asked that himself. I’m sure Becky asked that also. But I believe I know the answer, because I’ve seen this man in those moments of debate and decision when a person’s character is revealed —- in the Oval Office, in the Situation Room, in the theaters of war.

You see, if you look past all of Bob’s flashiness and bravado and his sharp attire, his love for the Washington limelight then what you see is a man that I’ve come to know and respect —- a humble American patriot; a man of common sense and decency; quite simply, one of our nation’s finest public servants.

Bob, today you’re not only one of the longest-serving Secretaries of Defense in American history, but it is also clear that you’ve been one of the best.

Why did Bob Gates serve? Our nation is at war, and to know Bob is to know his profound sense of duty — to country, to our security, and most of all, to our men and women who get up every day and put on America’s uniform and put their lives on the line to keep us safe and to keep us free.

When the outcome of the war in Iraq was in doubt, Bob Gates presided over the extraordinary efforts that helped restore order. Over the past two and a half years, we’ve removed more than 100,000 troops from Iraq, ended our combat mission and are responsibly ending that war.

When the fight against al Qaeda and our efforts in Afghanistan needed new focus, Bob Gates helped us devise the strategy that has finally put al Qaeda on a path to defeat and ensures that Afghanistan never again becomes a source for attacks against our nation.

When institutional inertia kept funding systems our troops didn’t need, Bob Gates launched a war on waste — challenging conventional wisdom with courage and conviction, speaking hard truths and saving hundreds of billions of dollars that can be invested in a 21st century military.

Bob Gates made it his mission to make sure this department is serving our troops in the field as well as they serve us. And today we see the lifesaving difference he made — in the mine-resistant vehicles and the unmanned aircraft, the shorter medevac times in Afghanistan, in our determination to give our wounded warriors the world-class care they deserve.

Bob, this may be your greatest legacy of all — the lives you saved and the confidence you gave our men and woman in battle who knew that there was a Secretary of Defense who had their backs and who loved them and who fought for them and who did everything in his power to bring them home safe.

Let me also thank Becky for her extraordinary support of our extraordinary military families. She’s been there day in and day out. And in may ways, I know both Bob and Becky consider our troops to be like their own sons and daughters. And, Bob, your sense of responsibility to them is profound.

It’s a responsibility we’ve shared, as leaders who have served every day in a time of war. We’re the ones who send them into harm’s way. We visit them in the field, knowing that we are the reason they’re there. We’ve stood in solemn respect at Dover when our fallen heroes have made their final journey home. We’ve held their families in our arms as they grieve the loved ones they gave to America so that our loved ones can be secure. We know the heavy wages of war, and we know America’s shared obligations to all who serve.

So today we not only pay tribute to a remarkable public servant; we celebrate the principles for which he served and for which our nation stands. I believe the life of Bob Gates is a lesson, especially to young Americans, a lesson that public service is an honorable calling; that we can pass our country, better and stronger, to those who follow.

Our next Secretary of Defense, Leon Panetta, has subscribed to this same life of service, and I’m confident that he, too, will lead this department with clear vision and a steady hand.

In his willingness to become the first Secretary of Defense to serve under Presidents of both parties, the integrity of Bob Gates is also a reminder, especially to folks here in Washington, that civility and respectful discourse, and citizenship over partisanship are not quaint relics of a bygone era; they are the timeless virtues that we need now more than ever. For whatever differences of party or ideology we may have, we can only keep America strong if we remember what keeps America great — our ability to come together and work together, as Americans, for a common purpose.

Finally, as we face difficult challenges around the world and here at home, let today be a reminder that the United States will meet the tests of our time. We remain at war, but today fewer Americans are in harm’s way, and we will bring the wars we’re in to a responsible end. We will make hard fiscal choices, but we’ll do so responsibly. And as Commander-in-Chief I am determined that our Armed Forces will always — always — remain the best-trained, the best-led, the best-equipped fighting force in history. And in an uncertain world that demands our leadership, the United States of America, and our Armed Forces, will remain the greatest force for freedom and security that the world has ever known.

This is the America — strong and confident — to which Bob Gates has devoted his life. And this is the America to which we rededicate ourselves.

I can think of no better way to express my appreciation to someone who I have come to admire and who I consider a friend, I can think of no better way to express the gratitude of the nation for Bob Gates, than with a very special recognition.

Bob, this is not in the program, but I would ask you to please stand.

As President, the highest honor that I can bestow on a civilian is the Presidential Medal of Freedom. It speaks to the values we cherish as a people and the ideals we strive for as a nation. And today it is my great privilege to present the Presidential Medal of Freedom to America’s 22nd Secretary of Defense, Robert M. Gates.

Here is the text of the Medal of Freedom presented to Secretary Robert Gates:

Our nation’s 22nd Secretary of Defense, Robert M. Gates, has selflessly dedicated his life to ensuring the security of the American people. He has served eight Presidents of both parties with unwavering patriotism. As a champion of our men and women in uniform and their families, he has led the Department of Defense with courage and confidence during our nation’s wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and ensured our Armed Forces are better prepared for the conflicts of today and tomorrow. The United States honors Robert M. Gates for his extraordinary leadership and for a lifetime of service and devotion to our nation.

After the medal was awarded, Secretary Gates gave some remarks. I want to thank Mr. Gates for his service to this country. We haven’t agreed in many areas, but he still served this country. I wish he would have made some of the stands earlier that he’s made since announcing his retirement, but better late than never.

Thank you, Mr. President, for those kind words and for honoring me and this department by your presence here today. I’m deeply honored and moved by your presentation of this award. It is a big surprise. But we should have known a couple of months ago; you’re getting pretty good at this covert ops stuff.

Mr. Vice President, distinguished guests, colleagues, friends, thank you for being here this morning.

First, I’d like to congratulate Leon Panetta on his recent confirmation. Right after the 2008 election, Leon wrote an op-ed suggesting President-elect Obama retain me as Secretary of Defense. So when President Obama asked for my recommendation for a successor, I returned the favor.

Seriously, this department and this country is fortunate that a statesman of Leon Panetta’s caliber and experience has agreed to serve once again, and at such an important time. My parting advice for Leon is to get his office just the way he likes it — he may be here longer than he thinks.

I’d like to thank the members of Congress with us today. I appreciate the gracious and supportive treatment accorded to me by senators and representatives of both parties these past four and a half years. Even when there were disagreements over policies and priorities, the Congress always came through for our men and women in uniform, especially for programs that protect and take care of troops and their families.

As you may have noticed over the past few weeks, I’ve had my say on some weighty topics. So on this, the last stop of what has been dubbed “the long goodbye,” I’d like to spend just a few minutes talking about the men and women that I’ve been fortunate to work with in this job.

I’d like to start with the two Presidents whom I’ve been privileged to serve in this role. Serving as Secretary of Defense has been the greatest honor and privilege of my life, and for that I will always be grateful. First, to President Bush for giving me this historic opportunity and for the support he provided during those difficult early months and years on the job. And then to President Obama for his confidence in taking the historic step of asking me, someone he did not know at all, to stay on, and for his continuing trust ever since.

The transition from the Bush to the Obama administration was the first of its kind from one political party to another during war in nearly 40 years. The collegiality, thoroughness, and professionalism of the Bush-Obama transition were of great benefit to the country, and were a tribute to the character and judgment of both Presidents.

I’ve also been fortunate that both Presidents provided me an excellent team of senior civilian appointees. When I took this post, the first and best decision I made was to retain every single senior official I inherited from Secretary Rumsfeld, including his personal front office staff, most of whom have been with me to this day.

Likewise, I’ve been fortunate to receive another first-class roster of senior civilian officials from President Obama. They’ve provided me superb counsel and support on a range of difficult institutional issues and strategic initiatives.

These and other achievements, indeed anything of consequence achieved in this department, required respectful collaboration between the civilian and military leadership, which has been a source of strength to the country. I’ve received wise, forthright, but loyal counsel from the service chiefs and from the leadership of the Joint Staff. And I’ll always be grateful to them for their candor, cooperation, and friendship.

Above all, though, I want to recognize and thank first, General Pete Pace, who was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs when I arrived, and whose counsel and friendship got me off to a strong start; and then, of course, my battle buddy of nearly four years, Admiral Mike Mullen. Without Mike’s advice to me, his effective leadership of the uniform military and our close partnership, the record of the last several years would, I think, have been very different.

Mike was never shy about disagreeing with me but unfailingly steadfast and loyal to me and to the Presidents he served once a decision was made. He is the epitome of a military leader and officer, a man of supreme integrity, a great partner, and a good friend.

A practice in spirit of cooperation is equally important for relationships with other elements of the government, especially those dealing with intelligence, development, and diplomacy. The blows struck against al Qaeda, culminating in the bin Laden raid, exemplified a remarkable transformation of how we must fuse intelligence and military operations in the 21st century.

With respect to the State Department, my views have, as they say in this town, evolved over the years. I started out my inter-agency experience in Washington, D.C. as a staffer on President Nixon’s National Security Council. As you might expect, the Nixon White House was not exactly a hotbed of admiration for the foreign service — generally thought of as a bunch of guys with last names for first names who occasionally took time out of their busy day to implement the President’s foreign policy. And for much of my professional life, the Secretaries of State and Defense were barely speaking to one another.

In the case of Secretaries Rice and Clinton, I’ve not only been on speaking terms with these two formidable women, we’ve also become cherished colleagues and good friends. I suppose that giving a big speech calling for more money for the State Department didn’t exactly hurt. But we should never forget the diplomats and development experts from State and AID are taking risks and making sacrifices in some of the planet’s least hospitable places. And I speak for all our military in appreciating the contributions they are making every day to the success of our missions in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere around the globe.

In doing my utmost to support the troops downrange on these missions, I’ve spent a good deal of time venting frustration with the Pentagon bureaucracy. However, I did so knowing that the people most often frustrated by the pace of things in this building are the career civilian professionals who strive every day to overcome the obstacles to getting things done. As someone who worked his way up through the GS ladder, I understand and appreciate the challenges these public servants face and the sacrifices they make. What they accomplish does not receive the attention and the thanks it deserves. So know that I leave this post grateful for everything our defense civilians do for our military and our national security.

During a time of war, the top priority of everyone in this building ultimately must be to get those fighting at the front what they need to survive and succeed on the battlefield and to be properly taken care of when they come home. I’ve spent much of the past two months visiting with these troops — first, in military facilities around the U.S., and then over several days at a number of forward-operating bases in Afghanistan. Though I was only able to meet a small sample of those who deployed downrange, it was important to me to look them in the eye one last time and let them know how much I care about them and appreciate what they and their families do for our country.

Looking forward to this moment, I knew it would be very difficult for me to adequately express my feelings for these young men and women — at least in a way that would allow me to get through this speech. So, yesterday, a personal message from me to all of our servicemen and women around the world was published and distributed through military channels. I’ll just say here that I will think of these young warriors — the ones who fought, the ones who keep on fighting, the ones who never made it back — till the end of my days.

Finally, as I was contemplating this moment, I thought about something Becky told me in January 2005, when I was asked to be the first director of national intelligence. I was really wrestling with the decision and finally told her she could make it a lot easier if she just said she didn’t want to go back to D.C. She thought a moment, and replied, “We have to do what you have to do.”

That is something military spouses have said in one form or another a million times since 9/11 upon learning that their loved one received a deployment notice or is considering another tour of service. Just under five years ago, when I was approached by the same President again to serve, Becky’s response was the same. As much as she loved Texas A&M and Aggie sports and our home in Washington State, and as much as she could do without another stint in this Washington, she made it easy for me to say yes to this job — to do what I had to do, to answer the call to serve when so much was at stake for America and her sons and daughters in two wars.

Well, Becky, we’re really going home this time. Your love and support has sustained me and kept me grounded since the day we first met on a blind date in Bloomington, Indiana, 45 years ago.

Shortly I’ll walk out of my office in the E ring for the last time as Defense Secretary. It’s empty of all my personal items and mementos, but will still have looming over my desk the portraits of two of my heroes and role models — Generals Dwight D. Eisenhower and George C. Marshall.

It is from Marshall that I take a closing thought, first delivered more than six decades ago in the opening years of the Cold War. Addressing new university graduates, Marshall extolled what he considered the great “musts” of that generation. They were, he said, “the development of a sense of responsibility for world order and security, the development of a sense of the overwhelming importance of the country’s acts and failures to act.”

Now, as when Marshall first uttered those words, a sense of America’s exceptional global responsibilities and the importance of what we do or do not do remain the great “musts” of this dangerous new century. It is the sacred duty entrusted to all of us privileged to serve in positions of leadership and responsibility; a duty we should never forget or take lightly; a duty I have every confidence you will all continue to fulfill.

Thank you. God bless our military and the country they so nobly serve.

Defense Policy Bill Advances in Senate

The Senate Committee on Armed Services unanimously approved the defense authorization bill for fiscal 2012 last week.

The legislation mirrors the House version in that it would allow DoD to increase TRICARE fees for under-65 retirees and caps the department’s ability to increase fees in the future.

Specifically, the Committee approved DoD’s request to increase the TRICARE Prime enrollment fee by $2.50 a month for individuals (from $230 to $260) and $5 a month for families (from $460 to $520). It also prohibited the Defense Department from proposing substantial annual increases in the future by ensuring the percentage increase can not exceed the percentage increase in military retired pay. Since this provision is included in both the House and Senate versions of the authorization bill, it is likely it will be included in the final version. How would indexing the fees to the COLA work?

The index is a percentage change, not a dollar amount change. Therefore, in 2012, the proposed TRICARE Prime enrollment fee for a family is $520 per year. If the 2013 COLA is 3 percent, the TRICARE Prime enrollment fee increase would be 3 percent of $520 = $15.60 for the year. In contrast, a 3 percent COLA would increase average retired pay by $900 a year.

The bill also:

* Authorizes $142.4 billion for military personnel, including costs of pay, allowances, bonuses, death benefits, and permanent change of station moves.

* Authorizes a 1.6 percent across-the-board pay raise for all members of the uniformed services, consistent with the President’s request.

* Requires that individuals newly enrolled in the Uniformed Services Family Health Plan after September 30, 2011, transition to TRICARE for Life once they become Medicare-eligible due to age.

* Prohibits the denial of reenlistment of a service member who has been determined by a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) to be fit for duty but who is subsequently determined to be unsuitable for continued military service for conditions considered by the PEB.

* Amends Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) relating to the offenses of rape, sexual assault, and other sexual misconduct, to create three separate articles of the UCMJ to correct deficiencies in existing law. Also repeals Article 125 of the UCMJ, relating to the offense of sodomy.

* Authorizes $25 million in supplemental impact aid to local educational agencies with military dependent children and $5 million in impact aid for schools with military dependent children with severe disabilities.

* Requires hostile fire and imminent danger pay be prorated according to the number of days spent in a qualifying area rather than be paid on a monthly basis.

* Funds fully ($3.2 billion) DOD’s Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicle (MRAP) fund, which provides for the sustainment and procurement of MRAPs and M-ATVs.

* Authorizes $10.4 billion for U.S. Special Operations Command, an increase of 6 percent above fiscal year 2011 levels.

* Fully supports the budget request of $633 million to procure 100 Stryker vehicles especially designed and built for the detection of nuclear, chemical, and biological agents.

* Fully supports the budget request of $884.4 million for the Army’s next-generation armored Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV) development.

* Cuts more than $1 billion from the President’s budget for military construction and family housing projects.

* Cuts $192.3 million from related Brigade Combat Team Modernization (BCTM) projects due to Early-Infantry Brigade Combat Team program termination.

Next action: The bill is headed to the full Senate for a vote, which is expected next month.

Happy Birthday to the US Army from the CoS and the SMA

Glad we have Dempsey and Chandler

I saw this today…

The voice of the Soldier has been heard: the Army announced the patrol cap will replace the black wool beret as the default headgear for the Army combat uniform.

Also changing are the options for how Soldiers can attach certain items to their ACU shirts. Army Chief of Staff Martin E. Dempsey said Soldiers will soon be able to sew on name tapes, service tapes, rank insignia and skill badges, instead of using Velcro.

The changes were made after Dempsey received input from Sergeant Major of the Army Raymond F. Chandler III, who had been tasked to gather opinions from Soldiers in the field.

… and it made me happy to know we have true leaders back in charge of the Army. I never understood how GEN Casey got relieved in Iraq and then made Chief of Staff. It even confused me more when later he said repeatedly that no  soldiers ever complained to him about the beret and as far as he knew it everyone loved it. I thought either was a a true a-hole of an idiot leader or he was kidnapped by aliens an replaced with a body double. Who knows which one it was.

All one had to do was read the editorials in the Army Times or see the results of the surveys the Army Times did every year of soldiers about the Army. Since the beret as the standard headgear was announced by then GEN Shisneski, it has been heavily criticized by the rank and file. Then when the ACU was introduced, all the complaints were about the velcro, the pin-on badges and the poor camouflage.

The Army is fixing the camo pattern, and now thanks to GEN Dempsey and SMA Chandler, the Army is going to fix those other important deficiencies on the ACU in addition to getting rid of the beret as the standard ACU headgear. Thank GOD we have common sense back in the top leadership of the Army.

This gives me hope that the Army will get back on track. I have met GEN Dempsey and SMA Chandler and I was impressed when I met them, but must more impressed now. They have shown in a very short time what their priorities are and that they are truly serving their soldiers, all of them.