Monthly Archives: February 2011

Dave Roever Visits Joint Base Balad

Dave Roever recently visited Joint Base Balad, Iraq on Feb 2, 2011 to speak to service members about his story of survival from the wounds of war, his experiences & resilience. Dave knows what resiliency is. While he was in Vietnam, his patrol came under heavy fire from a bunker. He picked up a white phospherus grenade, pulled, the pin, and was about to throw when the grenade blew up in his hand. The explosion blew a hole in his chest, nearly severed his right hand, and the entire right side of his face was burned practically to the skull. All this after telling his wife he’d “return without a scar.”

Operation Deep Freeze

January 12, 2011
EXCERPT
Source LINK
American Forces Press Service|by Elaine Wilson

WASHINGTON — An Air Force officer’s Antarctica-based blog is bringing science to life for students from the Department of Defense Education Activity and a Maryland-area school.

The blog’s author, Lt. Col. Ed “Hertz” Vaughan, was stationed in Antarctica for 50 days in support of Operation Deep Freeze, the military’s support of National Science Foundation Research. He wrote about his day-to-day experiences of living and working there in the blog “Dispatches from Antarctica,” which is featured on the Armed With Science website.

John Ohab, who coordinated this series for the Defense Department, shared Vaughan’s posts with students and science teachers worldwide and asked them to submit questions to Vaughan.

Ohab then passed on their questions to Vaughan, whose responses will be featured in three posts on Armed with Science this month. Questions submitted by Arnold Elementary School in Arnold, Md., already are posted and questions from DoDEA students will be featured Jan. 14.

In last week’s post, students wanted to know about everything from the food Vaughan ate to whether there were bugs in the frigid climate, which often plummets to minus 20 degrees Fahrenheit.

Vaughan’s responses include a mix of humor, science and some great video he shot while there.
Continue reading

The Case For Paying Taxes


Throughout my military career I’ve heard people both within and without the military mention that Soldiers should be exempt from paying income taxes. I’ve said it myself in the past. However, I’ve changed my mind.

For the past few years, I’ve been defense travel authority. As part of my duties, I ensure that military travel is paid for, legal, and ethical. I validate vouchers for travel reimbursement of official charges during temporary duty for training, conferences, or whatever other reason is needed for the travel. What I’ve noticed is that we, as Soldiers, take a lot for granted as it related to spending taxpayer money.

Military travel is governed by the Joint Forces Travel Regulation (JFTR). Every traveler is supposed to be familiar with it, but few are. It dictates what we can and cannot claim as an official expense. It dictates what kind of rental vehicles we’re authorized, how much we can spend on hotels, and what can be charged to the government travel card, which every Soldier is required to use for official travel.

In the 1990′s, the federal government made it mandatory to use government travel cards to pay for all official business expenses. This ended a longtime policy of advancing Soldiers money that was estimated that the trip would cost. The problem with this system is that often, troops would be advanced too much money and it was a pain getting that money back. Frequently, Soldiers would end up with debts due on their Leave and Earnings Statements. Since then, troops merely pay for all travel expenses with the government travel card and get reimbursed upon filing a voucher after the trip. It is the traveler’s responsibility to pay off the travel card at the end of the trip. So, if they don’t file a voucher to get reimbursed, they must pay the card out of their own pocket.

Because many people are not familiar with the JFTR, they tend to assume they are entitled to money they are not. They use the charge card for expenses that are not reimbursable. A good example of this is pre-paid fuel on rental cars. When dealing with government money, every expense must be justified and itemized. The tax-payers have the right to know what all their hard-earned tax money is being spent on. When the pre-pay fuel option is chosen, the rental car looks at the fuel guage to estimate how much fuel is needed to fill it up. For example, if they know that a car has a 12 gallon tank and the car is returned with the fuel gauge indicating a half tank, the company charges the traveler for six gallons. The problem with this is that it may only take five gallons to fill up the car in reality. How many times has your fuel gauge indicated empty but still had 2-3 more gallons left in it? If you return a car on empty, the company will charge you for 12 gallons. Since this is an ESTIMATE, the taxpayer could very easily be getting ripped off. Therefore, pre-pay fuel is discouraged and outright banned in most units (like mine).

Another common misconception about military travel is the laundry reimbursement. The JFTR authorized “up to $2 per day” for laundry expenses starting on the seventh day of travel. Most Soldier think they are ENTITLED to $2 per day just by virtue of being gone that long. I’ve seen it over and over again. A Soldier is gone for 20 days and requests reimbursement for $40 in laundry expenses. Receipts are not required to be presented with a voucher unless the expense is $75 or more. Receipts are also mandatory for airfare, hotel costs, and rental cars regardless of the cost.

The problem is that most Soldiers don’t really spend $2 per day on laundry, but they claim it. The mentality is that they are allowed $2 per day for laundry, regardless of whether they spent it. I’ve been TDY a lot in my career for trips that were as short as a day and as long as 6 months. I’ve NEVER in my entire career needed to spend the full $2 per day on laundry, even when I was using dry cleaning services because my mission required a suit or dress uniform. NEVER. And it’s not like I just don’t wash my clothes. Most military training locations provide free laundry services. Even if I had to pay for coin laundry, I didn’t have to wash more than three loads of laundry per week – PT clothes, uniform, and after duty hours civilian clothing. Provided that each load costs me about $3 to wash and dry, we’re talking $9 per week, even though I’m authorized up to $14. That first week, I may have also bought soap, which puts me up to $12 or $13. That expense would not be found in the following weeks.

If troops weren’t required to pay taxes, we wouldn’t have a personal stake in ensuring that every dollar we spend is spent wisely. As stewards of public funds, it is incumbent upon us to safeguard every dollar we’re authorized to spend. We must ensure that it is spent wisely, judiciously, and in a thrifty manner.

When I first got to my last unit, I estimated that we were spending about $8000 on ATM withdrawal and service fees every year. Soldiers are entitled to getting reimbursed for fees charged to withdraw money from their government travel card to pay for tips, tolls, or whatever. However, Soldiers were taking out multiple withdrawals each week. $20 here. $40 there. And each time, the fees averaged about $5. I put a stop to this and mandated that Soldiers were only authorized ONE ATM withdrawal per week. This dramatically cut our expenses and saved thousands of tax dollars. I have done the same thing in my current unit, as well as require receipts for all laundry expenses. Amazingly, the number of laundry claims has dropped.

In today’s massive budget deficit environment, the military MUST lead the way in refraining from abusing the public trust. We are responsible for ensuring that our national security is safeguarded. If this country goes bankrupt, our national security is affected. Therefore, proper stewardship of reimbursement and travel expenses is one way – besides shooting the bad guys – that we can protect this country! If we were exempt from paying taxes that we ultimately spend, we would have no real incentive to conserve, other than ideology – which many people lack these days. TDY is instead treated as a welfare program where we try to make as much money as possible.

Does the Pentagon Leadership want to get rid of the Infantry, Part II

Over at Bouhammer.com I wrote a entry a while back about the repeat of DADT and the proposal to put women in combat arms. You can read it at http://www.bouhammer.com/2011/01/does-the-pentagon-leadership-want-to-get-rid-of-the-infantry/. I had several comments on this posting and one of them came back with ton of info. After reading through it I decided to make it Part 2 of my original posting.

After reading through it I guess it became clear to me that just because it is a “military” panel, one should always ask “What kind of military?”

The info below was sent to my Dad by a good friend of his based on some research he has been doing regarding the females in combat arms units commission. A little history on both before I proceed. My dad served as an infantryman in the Marine Corps in Vietnam in 67/68, made the switch to the Army a few years later and retired after returning home from Desert Storm. His buddy, who did this research on the members of this commission, also served in Vietnam (as a combat engineer) and went on to retire from the Marines as a Colonel. Both have a good working knowledge and experience in the military. I am currently serving in the ARNG as an 11B and have OIF and OEF trips.

” I began reviewing this commission’s work yesterday after articles on this topic began appearing in the paper and weekly magazines. As far as I can determine there are three infantry officers on the commission out of 31 members. The chairman is a retired Air Force logistics officer. There are seven Air Force, five Army, one Air Guard, four Navy, one Army Reserve, two Coast Guard, three Marine regulars, one Marine reserve (Williams- served with him) and six civilians. Ten of thirty one are women. Many of the military folks are/were involved in personnel dealing with equal opportunity and diversity issues. Shamina Singh, trained in community relations, was an advisor to former House Speaker Pelosi. This commission is woefully lacking in infantry, armor, artillery and special operations membership- most of the military members never experienced life in the field. The MLDC Research Team consists of eleven women (none in the military) and two men (one an Air Force 1st. Lt.!). When reviewing their backgrounds they have dealt with harassment in the work place, diversity issues, minority officer recruiting and representation, labor economics, communications, and literature. No real military experience in this group. The MLDC Support Office consists of eleven members to include six women and five men (one Navy and one Air Force); nine of the members are civilians. Their back grounds include equal opportunity, promotion of minority members, diversity management, and community development. Ryan Callanan helped manage Hillary Clinton’s campaign to secure the Presidental nomination. Another member managed WIC programs in the Washington, D.C. area- another is a level 2 property appraiser. The Navy chief served on subs and the colonel was an Air Force navigator- no field experience in this group. In my humble opinion this commission (to include research and support staffs) is loaded with military and civilian folks who have never been required to live for extended times in the field, carrying very heavy loads trying to “close with the enemy and destroy them by fire and maneuver”. They have NO CLUE about these policy changes they are suggesting which will “OPEN UP” combat MOS’s to enhance “opportunities” for women.

Air Force planned Budget Numbers

Just like with the Army budget, The Stars and Stripes have looked into the budget for the Air Force and highlighted some of their winners and losers for the next year.

WINNERS:

Long-range bomber fans: The Air Force still isn’t releasing any details about the family of long-range systems, including the bomber. But they plan on spending $3.7 billion on the effort over the next five years.

Airmen living in Japan, UK: Even though overall military construction spending is down (and could drop behind schedule if Congress doesn’t OK more fiscal 2011 soon), the service plans to refurbish 1,361 units in those two countries next year….

LOSERS:

Joint Strike Fighter pilots: The Air Force still plans on buying 19 of the aircraft next year, but that’s three fewer than long-term planners had hoped for in 2012. Over the next five years, they expect to get 57 fewer than originally planned.

Logistics operations: About $300 million of the service’s operations and maintenance cuts will come from behind-the-scenes administrative and management programs….

In addition to those stats it appears that the Air Force is requesting a lot less than last year for the current fight, but is requesting a lot more for research and development into future systems. Check out the whole story at http://www.stripes.com/news/budget-breakdown-air-force-1.134830

UFOs over 110 Freeway?

Have you seen this? It’s short, but amazing footage of unexplained objects over the 110 Freeway near L.A.

The Army’s 2011 Budget proposal

Jeff over at Stripes.com did a good job breaking down and providing a BLUF outline of the 2011 Budget presented by the Obama Administration.

THE WINNERS:

Communications: Spending on communications equipment would increase from about $1.5 billion to $2.9 billion. Joint Communications would see a substantial increase from $438 million to $989 million. Likewise, Combat Communications would go up from $324 million to $911 million.

Aircraft: The Army plans to spend $708 million to modernize Apache helicopters and $659 million for more Gray Eagle unmanned surveillance aircraft. The budget also calls for $1.5 billion to modernize 71 Blackhawk helicopters and $1.4 billion for 32 new and 15 refurbished Chinooks….

THE LOSERS:

Other missiles: Remember the Non-Line of Sight Launch System, a next-generation missile launcher conceived as part of the Future Combat System? The project is dead, a year after the Army asked for $350 million for it in fiscal 2011. Also dead is the SLAMRAAM surface-to-air missile system. Spending for the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System would be slashed from $212 million to $32 million….

Be sure to head over to http://www.stripes.com/news/budget-breakdown-army-1.134831 and read the entire story with more numbers and facts.

Craig Morgan uses military training to save two children

Country superstar and past YouServed.com interviewee, Craig Morgan recently returned from playing for the troops for the ninth time in Iraq. Not long after returning he was driving down the road with his son when they saw a house on fire. As a trained professional and past EMT, Sheriff Deputy and 17 year Airborne Ranger soldier, he went on auto-pilot to risk his life and save others.

“The lady who owned the home came out with a fire extinguisher. I tried to put it out but it didn’t work. One thing led to another and in a matter of just a minute, the side of the house was engulfed by flames.”

It was then that the homeowner informed Morgan that her children were inside.

Not only did he rush in to save the lives of two children, he stayed there after finding out that he was even at more risk of an exploding house.

When I looked under the house and saw the gas line I got nervous. I was worried it could be a really ugly mess,” he said.

Again he didn’t turn away and worry more about himself or his career, he stayed and helped until first responders got there. He is as much of an example for Americans who put aside fame or star-status as Pat Tillman. I am proud to have met him and to know he continues to demonstrate the same patriotism and care for fellow Americans as most military and ex-military.

Read the whole story at http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2011/02/17/craig-morgan-saves-children-from-fire

Below is the past interview I did with Craig on July 4th, 2010.

You Served Interview with Craig Morgan from You Served Radio & Blog on Vimeo.

This interview is between Troy of YouServed.com and country superstar and former airborne jumpmaster, Craig Morgan. Craig was recently playing at Jam in the Valley in Varysburg, NY where Troy caught up with him. The interview was performed in Craig’s tour bus just a little while before he went on stage to play.

Baghdad Balks at US Benevolence; Demands $1 Billion

Since the war began, the United States has shoveled money into the country to improve infrastructure, social services, and the military. As a matter of fact, one of the main political talking points against the war in Iraq is the cost. We’ve spent so much money in Iraq, we can’t even account for all of it! Last year alone, Congress allocated $53 BILLION for the reconstruction of Iraq.

And yet, in spite of all the money we’ve been pouring down the open sewers of Iraq (which was NOT the advanced society some want you to believe it was before we got there, Iraq is DEMANDING $1 billion because Baghdad isn’t pretty any more.

The city’s government issued its demands in a statement on Wednesday that said Baghdad’s infrastructure and aesthetics have been seriously damaged by the American military.

“The U.S. forces changed this beautiful city to a camp in an ugly and destructive way, which reflected deliberate ignorance and carelessness about the simplest forms of public taste,” the statement said.

“Due to the huge damage, leading to a loss the Baghdad municipality cannot afford…we demand the American side apologize to Baghdad’s people and pay back these expenses.”

The statement made no mention of damage caused by bombing.

Now, I’m quite sure that with language like that, this is just Iraq’s version of the Berkeley City Council and making outrageous demands based on flawed logic and falty facts. The reason there are so many blast walls is to protect the Iraqi Government and other government officials from THE IRAQI PEOPLE that threatened to kill or destroy everything they could. The Iraqi government is in charge. If they want the blast walls removed, they can remove them. We can’t even spit in Iraq without asking for permission first.

“The city of Baghdad feels these violations, which have taken place for years, have caused economic and moral damage,” he said.

The moral damage is your own fault. We don’t owe you a dime. As a matter of fact, maybe we should you for every dollar spent taking care of the families of our fallen as a result of your government not controlling its people!!

High School Senior Raises $150,000 for Wounded Warriors

This was sent to me via email and it’s a GREAT program. It never ceases to amaze me the level of patriotism that some of our young people possess. I’ve written about this before, but the fact that a high school senior can raise $150,000 to help our wounded troops makes me wonder what could be done if all had his zeal. That’s no easy feat for anyone, much less a high school student who is trying to finish out his education and looking forward to progressing in it!

An amazing story of hope has emerged from a small New Jersey town thanks to high school senior Kristin Kosch. An honor student and soccer star, Kosch’s determination and ingenuity to raise money for severely injured veterans is being recognized by Homes for Our Troops (www.homesforourtroops.org), which announced that the 18-year-old has raised nearly $150,000. The money will continue to fund new construction of specially adapted houses for veterans who would otherwise struggle with the everyday tasks that are often taken for granted. Kosch’s efforts have inspired thousands, particularly the members of Kids for Our Troops (www.kidsforourtroops.org)—a rapidly expanding branch of Homes for Our Troops.

“When I started, I thought we were just going to raise some money, donate it and hope we helped,” says Kosch.

One such veteran, Vinsu Gonzalez from Hillsdale, NJ, received a Homes for Our Troops home last year, as a direct result of the money raised by Kosch. The 27-year-old veteran was shot by a sniper during his second tour in Iraq. He spent two grueling years in a Florida hospital due to his neck and chest injuries and now uses a wheelchair.

The desire to help others has quickly become a family tradition. Kristin’s father, Kevin Kosch—a retired police officer who now owns a construction business—lent his expertise to the building project in Hillsdale. When Kristin’s older brother Matthew heard about a local veteran who was severely injured and unable to care for himself, the fundraising efforts began. Matthew circulated a letter asking each of his fellow Mahwah High School students to donate one dollar to Homes for Our Troops and raised nearly $4,000.

Three years later, Kristin was a high school sophomore and Matthew left for Villanova University and the Marine Corps ROTC. Determined to continue her brother’s fundraising efforts, Kristin reached out to 25 school districts and more than 300 schools. Their donations—now spanning hundreds of schools and students of all ages—have already helped to fund four specially adapted homes in New Jersey. In 2010 alone, Kristin raised nearly $70,000 dollars for the organization.

Kristin believes that “it’s really important to give back to these soldiers what we can and let them know that we appreciate what they do for us…it’s the least we could do.”

Homes for Our Troops is a national non-profit 501c3 organization that is based in Taunton, MA. The charity was founded in 2004 to benefit servicemen and women who have suffered severely disabling wounds while serving their country since September 11, 2001.