Monthly Archives: February 2010

Talking with Children about Upsetting News Events

I came across the following topic on Massachusetts General Hospital’s forums. It was well written and very helpful information for all parents, but especially children of military members as they may be more sensitive to war related news.

 

Talking with Children about Upsetting News Events

Comments from: Paula K. Rauch, MD and colleagues from the MassGeneral Hospital for Children

EXCERPT

Dr. Rauch is a child psychiatrist who leads the Marjorie E. Korff PACT (Parenting At a Challenging Time) Program at the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center. www.mghpact.org

All children are exposed to news via newspapers, radio, the Internet, and especially television. And they naturally turn to their parents with questions about what they have seen and heard. For a child whose family is impacted by the earthquake in Haiti, news about the tragedy can raise concerns about their own family’s safety. Discussing these issues poses a special challenge for parents to listen, understand, and answer their children’s questions in a manner that is both honest and reassuring. Meeting this challenge successfully strengthens your child’s inner strength, sense of security, and trust in you.

First, you know your child best. You have likely been through good time and stressful times before. How your child has reacted in the past is often a good predictor for how he or she will cope with new challenges. Think about what has been helpful for your child previously, and use these successful strategies from the past. Most children will benefit from maintaining regular routines, including daily schedules and normal expectations for schoolwork. Children will take their emotional cues from the adults in their world. If we are calm usually they will feel secure; however, it is important to talk to your child about his or her specific concerns.

Second, check in with your child. Find out what he or she has been hearing, seeing and thinking about a new event or whether it has not yet come to his or her attention. Questions such as, “Are kids at school talking about __________?” or, “ What have you heard about __________?” are good ways to open such a conversation. If your child is younger and is not aware of the news, you may elect to go no further with this conversation. If your child has heard about the news event, encourage him or her to tell you about what they’ve heard or what they think about what others are saying. Ask if they have any specific worries. To answer questions and allay fears, it is important to really understand what your child is struggling with before you move to answer or reassure him.

Third, TV images can be upsetting. Turn off the TV around young children or those who may have been upset by TV news in the past. Be mindful that coverage of the same earthquake over and over again can be misinterpreted as something that is happening repeatedly. Watch television with older children so you can answer questions and be aware of their feelings. Some older children need to be reminded that the TV images can be overwhelming and that it’s OK not to watch. This is true for many adults, who may feel better listening to radio reports or reading newspaper coverage rather than watching disturbing TV images.

Fourth, make the most of family time. Spend extra time with your children. Turn off the telephone and the TV during meals so you can talk together. Often parents can identify times in the day or activities that facilitate thoughtful conversations. Sometimes, it is while driving in the car or when a child sits with a parent who is working in the kitchen. Those are great times to check in with your child and talk. CLICK TO READ MORE

Politicians to Military Widows, “Get lost.”

Our Gold Star wives lose, again. The Widow’s Tax was not eliminated again this year. The Widow’s Tax seems to get a lot of lip service from politicians of every walk and political persuasion. It all boils down to funding priorities. No one in this country has paid a higher price for our continued freedom in this wonderful Country.

Unfortunately for them that sacrifice is not enough for the “greedy hand” of our tax hungry government.

I don’t want to link or quote the most recent article that covers it in depth since it’s an AP source. Here is a link, however, to a search on “Military Widow’s Tax” that will lead you to a lot of  recent information.

Here’s an excerpt I found that is a non-AP source and it is well written. It also explains what the tax is about for those who are unfamiliar with the history of this travesty. From Newsvine:

As written in the Washington post: “The widows’ tax is a law that won’t allow surviving spouses to receive the retirement pay due them when their spouse died from a cause related to military service, and at the same time collect the full annuity – essentially an insurance policy most of their spouses opted to buy. They paid an average of 6.5 percent of their retirement pay in premiums, often $100 or more a month.

Because one benefit is subtracted from the other, affected surviving spouses lose about $1,000 a month on average. There are about 54,000 survivors who are affected by the policy, whose spouses served in conflicts from World War II to Afghanistan, and that number could grow. READ ENTIRE ARTICLE

 

The author quotes $100 a month, but I have read it can be as high as $1000 a month depending on the worth of the annuity. So the military promotes this benefit, and takes money from the soldier’s pay for the added coverage “just in case.” That benefit is paid for so that a soldier can provide for his/her family in the case of death, right? Then the Government takes the benefit away in the name of ‘taxes.’

If “pure and undefiled religion” in the eyes of God is “visiting the widows and orphans in their distress,” then taxing their income to this degree is an outright blasphemous sin.

Fallen Warrior Scholarship Fund

The information below was copied from the Patriot Guard Writer’s page. Please visit their site and the scholarship fund page. Pay close attention to the deadline because it’s approaching soon.

Fallen Warrior Scholarship Fund

The Patriot Guard Riders is a nonprofit, tax exempt organization strongly supported nationally by volunteers. The Fallen Warrior Scholarship Fund has been established to provide financial assistance in the form of scholarships to US military family members of our Fallen Warriors in their pursuit of higher education.  One-year scholarships of a minimum of $2000 are awarded annually, and are limited to studies at accredited educational/technical institutions.  Scholarship awards will be made co-payable to the scholarship recipient’s institution for payment of tuition, books and supplies.  Scholarships are not automatically renewable.  Recipients must reapply each year and may receive no more than four annual scholarships.

Applicant Eligibility Requirements

  • Must possess a valid military ID card and be the legal dependent of a US military member who died in the line of duty.
  • Must intend to make application to or be currently enrolled as a full-time student or minimum of 12 credit/semester hours in an accredited college or trade school, in pursuit of a degree or in a vocational program pursuing certification.
  • Must show proof of satisfactory academic progress: A high school diploma with a minimum 2.6 overall GPA based on a 4.0 scale or similar rating of current studies if within the last five years. Official transcripts are required.
  • Must provide two letters of recommendation (one to be completed by an education or business professional).
  • Must submit an original essay, typed, double spaced and a minimum of 500 and no more than 1000 words answering the following question: “How has facing the challenges presented to you affected your short-term and long-term goals, and how will further education prepare you for what you hope to achieve in the future?”  Please retype the question at the top of your essay response and omit your surname so that your essay may be evaluated objectively.
  • Must provide a one page resume or list of accomplishments to include past education, training, awards/honors, volunteer and employment experiences, and special interests. Please omit your surname so that your resume may be evaluated objectively.

Selection Process

Applicants must complete and submit the attached application/certification forms along with a current copy (front and back) of their military ID, original essay, resume, and two letters of recommendation. Incomplete packages will not be accepted.  Applicants will be selected for scholarship award recommendation based on their eligibility, their commitment to succeed as indicated by academic achievement, personal goals, letters of recommendation and resume, and their original essay response.  Scholarship award recommendations and final selection will be at the discretion of the Fallen Warrior Scholarship Committee. Applicant anonymity will be preserved during the selection process.

Time Table

April 1, 2010 Deadline for application submission

May 2010 Scholarship award notification

Please submit all questions to scholarship@patriotguard.org

Mail Completed Applications to:

Linda *Epicwoman* Snyder – Administrator
PGR Fallen Warrior Scholarship 
P.O. Box 375
Idleyld Park, Oregon 97447

Click Here to Download the Application

Feb 11th Live Blog

8:03:40 PM: Doing intros for the show

8:44:43 PM: MAJ Jason Amerine was the Commander of SF A-team and Eric had met him at West Point

8:47:44 PM: The families of the fallen took Eric in as one of their own and opened up their homes and hearts to him

8:55:33 PM: Eric has over 200 hours of interviews for this book

9:01:14 PM: Eric met with Karzai between meetings of Sarah Palin and Condaleeza Rice

9:01:45 PM: His meeting was only for 15 minutes, but it went over 1 hour and they kept Sec. Rice waiting

9:07:09 PM: Erica tallked to not only the SF team but also the AFSOC PaveLow pilots and others in the AirForce

9:12:32 PM: http://bit.ly/ah3Cio is Eric’s facebook page for the book

9:16:19 PM: Eric was just commenting that his book may be the last one that Charlie Wilson wrote a forward for

9:23:01 PM: Now talking with Perk

9:23:27 PM: Perk has been to Gitmo the last 4 trips, but toured with Bridge of Sighs the last 2 trips

9:28:49 PM: Perk singing at the 2004 LA Music Awards, http://bit.ly/9b5cNY

9:29:45 PM: Perk’s site is at http://bit.ly/clU2WE

9:31:48 PM: Perk’s grandfather served in WWII

9:34:10 PM: Perk is talking about the drinking at Gitmo

9:37:59 PM: Perk is a musician, singer, actor

9:44:14 PM: Perk is working on a beach travel show that will be aired in the LA area

9:53:00 PM: Perk was a great guest and is very down to earth

9:54:57 PM: CJ and Troy talking about Obama taking credit for the success in Iraq War

There must be 50 ways to leave your soldier…

I got a link in an email taking me to an article on Salon where a former Army wife touts how easy it is to leave a soldier while he is in theater. She starts her article off by making provocative and pathetically attention seeking claims about how easy it was for her to leave her deployed husband. She writes intentionally inflammatory things because she has a book in the making. It’s obvious she is capitalizing on what is supposed to be a very private pain, and instead she has turned into some sick public celebration.

Using shock and awe for marketing is old hat, but I guess if you can’t market yourself on stellar morals and integrity you are left with the Hollywood approach. I even found it reminiscent of the old Paul Simon song “50 ways to leave your lover,” where instead of handling a relationship like an adult a man is being told to “step out the back Jack, make a new plan Stan,…” Anything but looking the other person in the relationship in the face and dealing with the issues at hand. It’s the quintessential expression of self-centeredness.

The writer only got me mildly riled because she is outrageous and she will only appeal to other outrageous people. She will not be very persuasive to audiences outside of those who would already enjoy reading what she has to say — which is really a bunch indiscriminate drivel, in my humble opinion of course.

I won’t directly quote her because I am not interested in giving this attention seeking person any more attention than what is necessary to address a few disturbing things I found in the article. If you really must read it you can do a google search for “leave soldier salon” it’s the first article to come up.

My only disclaimer for anything I say below is this: I do not judge the pain and suffering that multiple deployments cause in a marriage and on the spouse who remains at home. It is harder than anything else I have ever witnessed. I would be a hypocrite to say that I understand because I have only faced deployment as a mother. I shouldn’t say “only” because that is no walk in the park. I have faced a long separation from my husband with very little contact when he was in the Army. I know it sucks. I know it’s taxing, but he was not in a war zone so I would  never pretend to fully understand the strain. I think it is safe to say this — I know it is exhausting and it takes a tremendous toll. I may not be able to address it directly, but I am by no means clueless since I am walk this road  with my daughter-in-law right now and several other very close and personal friends.

Below are some points I want to address from the article:

  • The author claims she fell in love with her soldier because he was a soldier. Romantic idealism is not a basis for a marriage. Should you marry because of this notion you are obligated to fulfill your marital vows — that is unless you thought ahead and instead of saying “until death do us part” you said “until death, boredom, or something else catches my fancy” do us part. The irony to this is she is now married to a “marxist” so it sounds as if she once again has fallen in love with an identity instead of a person. I wonder how long it will take before the ‘sexiness’ of Marxism wears off for her. Yes, the thought of her need for lithium did come to mind.
  • Sacrifices in military life are two way. The second that either party — the deployed or those waiting at home — fail to empathize with what the other is going through then problems start. It’s vital that the military marriage is viewed by both parties as a partnership and not merely as an “inconvenient truth.” This is not saying that even the strongest military marriages are not stretched beyond their means at times, but the resentment level seems to be lower when both spouses have a partnership mentality.
  • War protests (and therefore protesters) make life harder on military families. Newly released research clearly shows that military spouses and military children do better during multiple deployment if they don’t have Marxist hippies holding stupid signs that say asinine things like “no war for oil.” Spouses and children fight warfare in their minds daily. They do not need idiots outside their place of residence who then like to add insult to injury. I just had to mention this since said author makes it a point to state that the “Marxist” she is married to now had participated in protests while she was a military wife. Ironic, no?
  • Even though there are “50 ways to leave your lover” there is only one way to leave your children. It’s called abandonment. The final paragraphs of this article cover how the author’s son has chosen the path of his father (and millions of other wonderful men through out the Centuries) to serve this great Nation. The one statement she made that I can address head on is her concern about how it might feel to love her son now that he is a military member. My first thought was WTF? Then I reread it because I was sure she had said something else, right? No. She had to ask, and all I have to say is if you have to ask a question like that it really is time to learn a little something called sacrificial, unconditional, selfless love. If you failed to do this in marriage, now is the time to practice the concept. You love your soldier, sailor, marine, or airman like you always have, and then some. You work hard and sacrifice for them while they are working hard and sacrificing for you.  The only other thought I had, pardon the crude expression, was to woman-up and grow a set of ovaries!
  • An issue I discussed here a while back that is detrimental to military families is the entitlement mentality. Freedom, liberty and our personal pursuits are intricately tied up in our responsibilities. This concept is becoming more and more foreign in our culture. Everyone has an excuse for why they can’t follow through — I even heard a young woman the other day assigning what “percentage” of blame she owned in a situation. Have we become so petty and so cowardice that we can’t own the responsibility that is rightfully ours? It’s time to put big girl pants on and deal with it. We are not entitled to erotic love or even sexual gratification. I know our culture is steeped in it, but there are bigger things in this life. Sex is a wonderful and beautiful part of marriage — I am no prude!  For the love of all things good it’s not the main goal in life and if it is you are officially diagnosable.

The only other advice I offer is this — if you are a disgruntled ex-wife or ex-girlfriend of a military member and plan on writing a book any time soon, never use the back of a deployed soldier you kicked in the face as your platform for sympathy. Not only is it the most classless thing you can do, but it will backfire on you. Any brilliance you presume to have will be outdone by brave women wearing Gold Stars. Other women I know shine their Blue Stars every morning and they get up and deal with the life they have before them.

Plain and simple – I do not hear self-pity from them and they have a reason to express their pain and suffering. I think pity and whining sums up  what I  heard in the tone of that article.

One further illumination of  the point are the Silver Star families. There are hundreds of spouses, parents, friends and loved ones who are caring for their wounded warriors. I have three good friends who have husbands with severe TBI, PTSD and two have been through multiple surgeries to correct wounds they sustained by IEDs. These women do not feel cheated. Everyday they wake up happy they married a man with substance to his character, and a man who stands for the right things and not selfish motivations. They are grateful for the hardships they face each day with doctor’s appointments, procedures, and problem solving around memory issues, because they know the alternative would have meant burying their husbands. One of my friends told me a while back that people have asked her if she knew then what she knows now, would she have married a soldier? She told me with tears in her eyes, “I tell them proudly that I would. I have no regrets and count myself blessed to love my husband who just so happens to be a soldier.”

That’s the difference between falling in love with an idea and falling in love with a man.

It appears our allies are ponying up

Well it seems that finally out allies in the coalition that are trying to stabilize Afghanistan are finally putting some more skin in the game. I don’t know what our Administration or military leadership has promised them, but I hope their presence in Afghanistan will be more than just supporting from inside the FOB.

Germany’s Cabinet has formally approved plans to increase the country’s troop contingent in Afghanistan by up to 850 troops.
Government spokesman Christoph Steegmans said Tuesday that the mandate under which German soldiers serve in Afghanistan will be raised to allow a maximum 5,350 to serve there – up from the current 4,500.
Under the plan, announced last month, Berlin will send 500 extra troops to Afghanistan and focus more strongly on training local forces. The new mandate will allow for another 350 soldiers to be deployed as a “flexible reserve,” for example helping secure elections.
Parliamentary approval is still required for the mandate, as for all German deployments abroad. Steegmans said it will run through Feb. 28 next year.


Jim Beam is giving back to the troops

The great folks at Jim Beam, whom we have interviewed before on You Served Radio, are back at it in trying to find other ways to recognize and support the troops.

Dear Friend of the Red Stag by Jim Beam™, At Jim Beam®, we have a ton of respect for America’s military and their families—and we know that you do too. In fact, like us, you probably even have friends and family who are committed service members, and we’re guessing that you’d like to find a way to show your appreciation to them.

Jim Beam® is all about bringing guys together to bond over legendary experiences and create stories to last a lifetime. That’s why we’re kicking off “Salute Soldiers with the Spirit of America “, a contest designed to welcome home the returning troops, support those still on duty overseas, and provide service members and their friends amazing, all-American experiences throughout the year.

We’re giving you three easy ways to get involved.

1. Nominate a service member or family member at www.jimbeam.com or www.facebook.com/jimbeam for an opportunity to win a once-in-a-lifetime experience at a high-profile sporting event or live music concert. Four winners will find themselves and their military buddies with exclusive experiences at some of the most extraordinary events of the year—from the famous thoroughbred stakes race at Churchill Downs to a live Kid Rock concert.

2. Toast the troops virtually at www.facebook.com/jimbeam .

3. Text the word SALUTE to 90999 to donate $5 to Operation Homefront®, a nonprofit organization providing support and morale to troops, to the families they leave behind while they serve, and to wounded warriors when they return home.

When prompted, reply with YES to confirm your gift.

A one-time donation of $5 will be added to your mobile phone bill or deducted from your prepaid balance. You will also receive up to 1 message per day from Operation Homefront Alerts. Msg & Data Rates May Apply. All charges are billed by and payable to your mobile service provider. Service is available on most carriers. Donations are collected for the benefit of Operation Homefront by the mGive Foundation and subject to the terms found at www.mGive.com/A . To unsubscribe text STOP to 90999, for help text HELP to 90999.


HBO Series to Portray WWII Pacific Theater

This looks pretty interesting. HBO’s The Pacific, is an upcoming miniseries about the Pacific Theater of WWII from Tom Hanks, Steven Spielberg and Gary Goetzman. The Pacific premieres on HBO Sunday, March 14th. I watched the trailers and it looks as intense as Saving Private Ryan was. I hope it comes out in DVD since I don’t have HBO.

Officers and NCOs

There is a huge difference between Officers and NCOs in the Army. Because of these differences, I decided against my Commanders’ advice and remained within the enlisted ranks. It’s hard to put into words, so let me tell you a few stories.

Eleven people were dangling below a helicopter on a rope. There were ten Officers and one NCO. Since the rope was not strong enough to hold all the eleven, they decided that one of them had to let go to save all the others.

They could not decide who should be the volunteer. Finally the NCO said he would let go of the rope since NCOs are used to doing everything for the good of the Service. They forsake their family, don’t claim all of their expenses, and do a lot of overtime without getting anything in return.
Continue reading

Soldier of the Week – SSG Matthew Groppi

matthew groppi
After sitting in classrooms for many semesters learning about endangered species preservation and wildlife regulation enforcement, Matthew Groppi had the chance to apply his knowledge in the great outdoors working for the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. However, just months into his job, the Army Reserve staff sergeant was called to serve his country and apply the lessons learned in school during a deployment in Afghanistan.

“Being that I am a recent college graduate, I wanted my role in the military to be applicable to my civilian job. I wanted my employer to benefit from my time overseas too,” he said. “My time in Afghanistan gave me an international application to what I had learned in class and in the U.S.”

While deployed to Afghanistan with the 330th Military Police Detachment from October 2008 to August 2009, Groppi and his unit were responsible for law enforcement patrols, specifically to ensure compliance regarding customs regulations. In conjunction with his law enforcement patrol duties and tying in his natural resources background, he was responsible for training Soldiers about wildlife conservation and threatened or endangered species native to Afghanistan. Since animal furs are a popular tourist export, the Soldiers were responsible for ensuring that outgoing customs items were thoroughly checked.

Although much of his deployment was spent within the wire regulating customs and training his fellow Soldiers, Groppi had the opportunity to visit a national park in Afghanistan, which he says was the highlight of his time overseas.

“It was the most beautiful place I’ve ever seen. The landscape was quite striking and very beautiful,” Groppi said. “After seeing it, it was hard to stay on base knowing what was out there.”

Groppi also deployed to Iraq in 2004 with the 330th Military Police Detachment. In June 2004, while the unit was performing a mission at the Police Academy in Mosul, a suicide bomber attacked the academy with a vehicle-borne improvised explosive device. Two of the Soldiers were killed and six Soldiers, including Groppi, were wounded in the incident. Groppi returned home a month later to undergo surgery for his injuries and was awarded the Purple Heart. He has since made a full recovery.

After returning from Afghanistan in August 2009, Groppi continues to work as a conservation warden for the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and is responsible for traveling throughout the state to enforce hunting, fishing, environmental and RV laws. In the coming months, he will be finishing his probationary period with the DNR that was put on hold during his most recent deployment. The Soldier is a graduate of Waukesha North High School and received a Bachelor of Science from the University of Wisconsin – Stevens Point.