I’m one that never really trusts a reporter until I’ve had some personal interaction with them, but I consider Michael Yon a pretty decent guy having not interacted with him. That is why I haven’t completely written him off as yet another guy with a pen or a blog that has gone over the edge with too much time in country and not enough time decompressing.
You can see a man that is teetering on the edge by just looking at his Facebook page from the last several days. He is all over the place claiming Gen McCrystal can’t be trusted.
Life was good before I went to Iraq. But after three friends were killed during the GWOT, and my growing mistrust for the media and for the US Government/Military, I quit traveling the world and went to war. The United States was in peril. I am American. Today, I do not trust McChrystal anymore than some people trust the New York Times, Obama or Bush. If McChrystal could be trusted, I would go back to my better life. McChrystal is a great killer but this war is above his head. He must be watched.
What has prompted Michael to lose it in such a public fashion? It may just have something to due with being kicked off his fourth embed.
McChrystal’s crew has spoken: Embed is ended. This comes from McChrystal’s own spokesman (through one CPT Jane Campbell USN cc RADM Greg Smith and COL Wayne Shanks USA). This lends confirmation to ideas that the disembed came from McChrystal’s crew. (If not before, 100% now.) McChrystal cannot be trusted to tell the truth about this war. Packing my bags.
The disembed from McChrytal’s top staff (meaning from McChrystal himself) is a very bad sign. Sends chills that McChrystal himself thinks we are losing the war. McChrystal has a history of covering up. This causes concern that McChrystal might be misleading SecDef and President. Are they getting the facts?
There are more examples like him going completely nuts over a Canadian general accidently discharging his weapon while on base. Yeah, it’s a pretty dumb thing to do especially as a general, but Michael’s conclusions of the general’s ability to lead are highly flawed. Not to mention there are many better things he could be writing about instead of focusing time and energy on a man who made a mistake. Oh, and that mistake is currently being investigated and probably won’t end well for the general.
Now, the point of this isn’t to just fire away at Michael in hopes of destroying him. Instead, the goal is to encourage Michael to take a couple of steps back and examine what is going on around him. He needs to acknowledge his mistakes that lead him to be removed from this embed and the previous three. Michael has done great work in the past and I won’t begin to hide that. However, there comes a time that you have to ask him when will it become clear that it’s you, not them?
I’m not the only one that has noticed Michael on the edge of self destruct. This list will likely grow over the course of the day and you may find more up to date lists on some of these other blogs. I highly suggest you also read what they have wrote for additional and different perspective.

