Monthly Archives: August 2010

Join me tonight as we talk about troop support!

Tonight the tables are turned. Instead of me asking the questions I am the one being interviewed. Join me tonight around 8:45 EST. I have been invited on the radio show “Support our Troops in Word and Deed” to talk about practical approaches to troop support. Join us tonight by following the link below to the station’s homepage:

Support Our Troops In Word and Deed

From the Mouth of Babes

11yr. Old gives her “America’s Freedom” Speech to crowd of over 2,000 at Tea Party fireworks rally in Tallahassee, FL. July 4th, 2009.

DOD Gun Policies To Be Nullified

Nearly a year ago, Nidal Hasan (I won’t use an Army rank he doesn’t deserve to wear) walked into the Fort Hood deployment processing center and killed or injured more than 40 of his fellow troops – MY fellow troops. As a result of this shooting, the DOD and many installations, including Fort Hood, conducted an assessment of their weapons policies. Fort Hood, for example, mandated the registration of any and all privately owned weapons transported or stored on Fort Hood. This is great for those that follow the rules, but would not have prevented Hasan from doing what he did.

Some installations like Forts Campbell and Bliss went so far as to require registration of weapons owned by troops who lived OFF post. Insane, I know! Worse, Fort Riley imposed regulations that also required that weapons be registered that are owned by Soldiers’ family members residing anywhere in Kansas!

C. Military personnel will:
(1) Register all their privately-owned firearms and the firearms of their Family members that are stored in their residence or within the state of Kansas, with their unit commander.
FR Regulation 190-1, para 7c(1), dated 15 March 2010

Shocked and/or outraged? Well, according to American Rifleman magazine, Oklahoma Senator Jim Inhofe has offered an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act for FY11, which was adopted on May 27 in a voice vote by the Senate Armed Services Committee. The amendment would:

* Prohibit DOD from restricting “acquisition, possession, ownership, carrying or other use” of personally owned firearms by service members and DOD civilian while off base;
* Prohibit DOD from requiring registration of guns stored off base;
* Nullify military orders and regulations that impose such restrictions;
* Require DOD to destroy existing gun registration records on off-base firearms;
* Preserve DOD’s authority to “regulate the possession, carrying or other use of a firearm, ammunition or other weapon” by personnel on-duty or in military uniform; and
* Preserve DOD’s authority to keep records related to criminal and other legitimate investigations

I whole-heartedly support this amendment and agree that our Constitutional right to keep and bear arms uninfringed while off-base and off-duty should be protected. I support Senator Inhofe in his efforts to move this out of committee and the through the legislative process.

GI Bill Overpayment Headaches

We all know the vital importance of checking out that LES, right? Overpayments, underpayments, missing money and magic money just happen sometimes. The military is a huge bureaucracy and so it is to be expected. My advice has always been if you receive an overpayment set the money aside and start the trail of phone calls. Eventually all overpayments will catch up with you and it will most likely happen at the most inconvient time.

The new GI Bill seems to be experiencing some of the same problems (no surprises there) but a system glitch is also not fully crediting accounts that are paid back and this is causing some GI Bill reeipients to possible lose their benefits when they need them the most!

Below is a snippet regarding the ordeal that an Army spouse went through with repayment of an overpayment — an overpayment she recognized and tried to get stopped, but was unable. She paid it all back but was still being threatened with a stop on her benefits — it took elected officials and a news story in order to get the mess cleared up.

If you are having any problems of this nature, leave your story in the comment section.

Fix of GI Bill overpayment snafu doesn’t end issue
EXCERPT

–snip–

Kargus had several overpayment issues, but the nagging one involved the one-time book allowance and four months of living stipends she received erroneously last year.

She tried to get the payments stopped days after she got the first one. But like others, Kargus said she had problems last year when she tried to call a GI Bill hot line established by VA to answer questions.

She said she called as often as 15 times in one day without getting through to anyone. When calls were answered, Kargus said VA workers “were courteous, but did not have the power to do anything about my problems.”

“Every time I would call VA and ask them to please stop the payments, I was told that no mechanism was in place to resolve the issue and that I shouldn’t send any additional repayments because it would only clog the system,” she said.

Kargus said the friendly but unhelpful VA assistance continued through Aug. 9, when she spoke to an employee at the debt management center to try to figure out why she was still being threatened with a cutoff of benefits after repaying the $2,140 she had been told she owed.

Her check had been cashed, but VA officials could not explain what had happened to $791 of the payment.

Kargus said the call telling her that her debt finally was canceled came from Dan Osendorf, who heads the VA’s debt management center.

“He assured me my debt was cleared,” she said.

He also said the call center employee who told Kargus on Aug. 9 that he couldn’t help her “was new and made an error when telling me he could not fix my account.”

Kargus is hardly the only person with GI Bill overpayment and repayment problems. The House voted July 28 to set aside $100,000 in the 2011 budget for VA to pay for a report on how it accounts for payments and repayments.

Rep. Baron Hill, D-Ind., said he sponsored the amendment ordering the study after hearing many complaints.

“I understand that VA legitimately requires some payments to veterans and universities to be returned,” he said. “There can be instances of a student taking fewer classes than what was originally thought, accidental duplication payments. This is reasonable, to an extent.”

The trouble, he said, is that veterans and schools have difficulty getting an accurate account of payments and collections.

“In some instances, this has resulted in VA withholding further Post-9/11 payments to the student in question as they are credited with an outstanding debt, despite having already paid back the necessary accounts,” he said, describing a situation exactly like what Kargus faced.

“This is even after the returned checks have been cashed by the VA,” Hill said — again, exactly what Kargus said happened to her.

The report requested by Hill, and added to the 2011 VA funding bill by voice vote, would be due by Jan. 1. SOURCE LINK

At least the garbage-men respect the flag

I am writing this blog posting to hopefully inform some of those who are ignorant to the proper way of disposing of an American Flag.

Today is “trash-day” in my neighborhood and while driving home on my street I saw a faded American flag half-hanging out of the garbage can a few houses up the street from mine. Now granted I was only a couple of hours from flying out to head overseas and my last minutes at home were precious but I could not just let it sit there.

So I parked and got out as my wife walked outside. She asked me where I was going as I started pounding up the sidewalk and I told her I had to rescue a flag. I walked the several houses up and approached the trashcan. I got more furious with every step I took as I got closer and closer to the flag. I did not think the trash guys had come yet so I wanted to “rescue” the flag before they did.

I was very surprised when I opened the lid of some stranger’s house and saw that trash had already been taken. it appeared that the trash guys had come, but I assume they must have seen the flag being thrown out by the owner and rather than allowing it to be compacted in the truck and eventually hauled to the dump, they took it out and hung it half in and half out of the trash can.

I was furious at the owner for just throwing it away, but I must say seeing that the garbage men took the time to rescue it from being forever desecrated really made me feel good. Now I don’t know the owner and it is possible they just didn’t know of the proper way to dispose of a worn or faded flag. I also don’t know the garbage guys, but it is possible they are veterans or maybe just good old plain Americans that know better than to allow a flag to be thrown away.

As I walked back to my house with the flag I started to wonder “why” the garbage men hung it halfway out. Why not just throw it back in the can? The best I can come up with was they wanted to either “shame” the owner or maybe they were hoping that someone who cared about how a flag is treated would wander by and see it and retrieve it. I guess that is where I came in.

It is a shame to think that anyone who takes the time and energy to purchase and fly a flag (they must be somewhat patriotic, right?) does not know or care about how a flag should be disposed of. There is a ritual (for lack of a better term) that is spelled out on how a flag should be disposed of. You can read about the way to do this at http://www.usflag.org/flagetiquette.html. If someone who owns a worn flag does not have the ability to dispose of it properly, they have options. They can take it to a VFW, American Legion or even a Boy Scout Troop. Those organization hold flag “ceremonies” often to dispose of worn flags in a respectful and dignified way.

So please do me a favor, if you fly an American Flag regularly or happen to just be in possession of one that has become worn, frayed or faded don’t just throw it away. Take it to one of the groups mentioned above or call around to see if a local military unit or base or even law enforcement branch can and will dispose of it properly. For God’s sake don’t throw it out with the used coffee grounds and soiled diapers. Men and women have and still die for that Flag and what it stands for. Honor them and all of those who serve it and take a few minutes out of your “busy” life and do it right.

To my honorable garbage men, I THANK YOU and when I am back home from overseas I plan to do that personally on the next trash day.

Breaking News For Texan Troops


At an on-the-record luncheon at Clem Mikeska’s Pitt BBQ Grill in Temple today, Texas Governor Rick Perry said he would sign legislation that exempted active duty troops from paying sales tax on vehicles registered in state but purchased while stationed elsewhere.

In the state of Texas, in order to register a vehicle the owner must pay the difference in sales tax from the state in which it was purchased. For example, the state sales tax in Texas is 8.25%. In Alabama, the state sales tax is 6%. If I purchase a vehicle in Alabama while stationed at Redstone Arsenal or Fort Rucker valued at $25,000 I would pay about $1500 in sales tax. That same vehicle would result in $2062 in sales tax, a difference of $562. Montana sales tax is 0%, which would be a $2062 difference that I would have to pay the state of Texas prior to being allowed to register my vehicle.

For the majority of society, the sales taxes and other fees are rolled into the vehicle loan. So, members of the military would have to take out an additional loan on their vehicle to cover the cost or borrow money to register their vehicle in Texas because most troops don’t have an extra few hundred or thousand dollars to register their vehicles. Keep in mind, this is in addition to the registration fee, not a part of it.

Today, I sat down to a luncheon in which Governor Perry was addressing Temple constituents. I had the opportunity to ask the first question after he was done with his presentation. My question was simple and to the point, but first I asked him a question I had been sent from Twitter: Will he run for president? No real answer, yes or no.

Then, I asked him if he would support legislation that exempted active duty military troops from paying additional sales tax to register vehicles in the great state of Texas that were purchased out of state. He looked straight at State Legislator Ralph Sheffield, 31st District Representative, and told him that if Mr. Sheffield submitted the legislation he would sign it into law! No talking around the subject and no beating around the bush.

Mr. Sheffield gave me his card and I will follow up with him. What other active duty Texan citizens need to do is contact their local district representatives and urge them to support this legislation. If you don’t know who your state legislator is (shame on you), you can go HERE and input your address to find out.

Independent reporter Nathan Webster

Photo by Nathan Webster

Nathan Webster is a Desert Storm Army veteran.  He’s gone back to Iraq several times as an independent reporter.  CJ recently spoke with Nathan about his time in Iraq on You Served Radio.  This post collects links to several of his articles about Iraq including a few soldier profiles he did for hometown newspapers.

Sons of Iraq patrol recon – building relationships one night at a time

Freeing a sheikh pays dividends in Tarmiyah

Steve Mumford’s Iraq, and Mine

Training ground as real as it gets

Iraq now a much safer place for this local soldier

Continue reading

Get your woman under control!

I found the following on a Spousebuzz Facebook post and thought it was an interesting topic for discussion. This is something I was “warned” about when Bryan entered OCS and I began building friendships with other wives. “Don’t wear his rank. Mind your P’s and Q’s. Everything you do and say can and will affect his military career!” It was a lot of stress that I was really not prepared for. Now I can understand how a spouse’s poor public behavior can have a negative impact on their partner’s career (regardless of gender!) If my husband were better known as “the town drunk” where we live then I may have a very hard time establishing myself as a substance abuse counselor. Let’s face it… we are “one flesh” when we are married and our spouse can make or break us.

With that much said, in the above scenario, I don’t think anyone would come and tell me to get “my man under control!” Maybe it would need to be said, but I doubt it would be said that way. It is a little preposterous to think that a husband can put a gag order on his wife. He can ask her and even demand her and sanction her in ways that marriage allows, but what she chooses to do with that is what she chooses to do. He is left with the same recourse that a woman would be left with — live with it, get counseling or seek other types of actions/consequences against her.

Check out the article:

LINK TO SOURCE

Service members shouldn’t be expected to control their wives

Excerpt

The Virginian-Pilot
August 23, 2010

Keep your house in order. Control your wife. Lay down the law. Put her in her place. These are just a few of the responses generated on Military.com after the June story about the Fort Bragg colonel’s wife who was barred from all interaction with the unit and family members after her actions were deemed harmful.

What interested me most about the posts on the subject was how often the dictum to “control your wife” was stated.

After the furor around the story itself died down, I found myself thinking about the idea that a service member should or even could control his spouse. How are we supposed to “control” the actions of an adult? We tell our soldiers and sailors and Marines and airmen that they are “responsible” for their family members, but that is a far cry from “controlling” them. In my experience, once a family member is too big to pick up and haul into their crib, they are too big to physically control without incurring the wrath of law enforcement.

Yet from all the responses on this story, it is obvious the expectation that a service member at any level ought to be able to control his (never her) spouse clearly lives on. That’s a bad, bad idea. We know this already.

In the Cold War military, there was a belief that you could judge a service member by the way he ran his family. If you can’t control your family, how can you control an army? That led to a lot of culturally harmful behavior. Check out Mary Edwards Wertsch’s Military Brats for dozens of personal accounts from family members who lived with a service member who desperately tried to control the activities of his spouse, the social behavior of his children, the outward image of his family. That didn’t work during the Cold War when society was much more formal. That sure won’t work in a post 9/11 society of Facebook and employed spouses and geographic bachelors.

LINK TO ENTIRE ARTICLE

Tobacco Shipments to Resume to Troops Overseas

The U.S. Postal Service that it plans to resume shipping care packages with cigarettes and other tobacco to Soldiers serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. A law aimed at preventing smuggling had unintentionally banned families from sending tobacco to military members serving overseas. Spokesman Greg Frey said the postal service is planning to issue new instructions that could allow shipments to resume possibly as soon as Aug. 27. The Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act of 2009 quietly took effect June 29. It cut off those care packages by effectively requiring that tobacco be sent with one particular kind of U.S. Postal Service shipping that requires a signature for delivery. The law was created to prevent minors from ordering cigarettes through the mail and to prevent trafficking by requiring tracking and confirmation that the recipient is old enough. It allows small shipments of tobacco products, but only via Express Mail because that’s the only postal service product that meets the identification requirements under the law. Click the following link to read more: http://www.armytimes.com/news/2010/08/ap-tobacco-overseas-081210/


The fat lady hasn’t sung yet… don’t forget the 50K still in Iraq!

It’s plastered all over the media “The last combat troops leave Iraq!” My son was in the final convoy of the 4/2 Brigade as they rolled into Kuwait. The headlines have been music to my ears, but even in all of the celebration music playing in our home, I have to say — “The fat lady hasn’t sung yet!”

I have a fear that the media’s overplay of the war moving toward coming to an end is deeply down playing the very real fact that there are 50K troops still in Iraq. They are there at a crucial time, they are there among the very real threats that they were facing a month ago, and they are away from their families! Their sacrifice has not changed. They may not be in an official “combat role,” but that does not negate a single fact about their sacrifices and their risks.

Keep them in your prayers and remember they need our support. They are there at a very critical time and need to know we have not forgotten them or their mission!