adobe premiere 5.1 le manual online Download Software adobe creative suite premium serial number metal plugin for adobe photoshop Download Adobe Illustrator CS4 adobe dreamweaver cs3 crack corel designer vs adobe illustrator Download Adobe InDesign CS3 tips tricks adobe photoshop elements 5 adobe illustrator image viewer Download Adobe InDesign CS4 MAC free download of adobe photoshop cs adobe dreamweaver cs3 training classes manhattan Download Adobe InDesign CS4 adobe illustrator mac os x 6 0 adobe premiere serial Download Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended adobe creative suite 2 adobe photoshop plugins plug-ins filters Download Adobe Photoshop CS4 Extended MAC adobe flash cost adobe photoshop serial installation key Download Adobe Photoshop Elements 8 adobe premiere sony camera problems capture adobe flash player movie save Download Adobe Premiere Pro CS3 adobe flash 3d flash 9 new version when adobe Download Adobe Captivate 4 adobe flash 8 install adobe photoshop elements 5.0 serial numbers Download Adobe Audition 3 postforum adobe after effects forum central manual for adobe photoshop 7 Download Adobe Premiere Elements 8 adobe illustrator cs3 crack mac adobe photoshop elements 6.0 Download Adobe RoboHelp 8 adobe illustrator art files
On Loan at YouServed Military Stats

Archive for December, 2008

Help for wounded Veterans and caregivers

The first part of this post has been copied from an email I received about an opportunity to help wounded Veterans and their families during the holiday season. The contact form has three options: 1. Send a monetary gift and a get well/Happy Holidays card to a wounded Veteran, 2. Send just a monetary gift, or 3. Send just a get well message.

The link to the donation and message page is linked in the message below. Continue reading beyond the first message. The second half of this message is about Operation Lift Transformed, which is a program that helps military spouses of wounded Veterans retrain in order to earn income from home while they care for their wounded spouse.

Two great programs. Two great resources. Two wonderful ways to reach out and give or receive depending on your need and ability this Christmas Season.

If you need to know how to apply for assistance through the Emergency Secret Santa program use the contact form provided at the donation site. Continue reading this post…

2 Comments »

Thank You, President Bush (Part IV)

“Part IV?!” you say. On my blog, A Soldier’s Perspective, I’ve already written three of these (Here, Here, and Here). And I think it’s important to ensure that as many people as possible understand that President Bush had MANY accomplishments during his tenure. Unfortunately, the DISloyal opposition has known no limits in bringing down this President (and the country with him).

Because I’m in the military, I tend to focus more on the military, national security, and veterans aspect of his leadership. He hasn’t gotten any credit for ANYTHING he’s done, much less when it comes to keeping this country safe. I’m not a big fan of the “we haven’t been attacked in seven years” defense as proof that Bush succeeded. I mean, from 1993 to 2001 we weren’t attacked either after the first World Trade Center bombing. As a matter of fact, we stopped just as many attempts during Clinton’s reign as we did during Bush’s reign (the millennium bomber comes to mind).
president bush american legion terrorism
President Bush has done a lot to transform our Armed Forces to confront today’s and tomorrow’s threats. It hasn’t been easy because he had to not only transform our military, but had to do it with far fewer troops thanks for eight years of military cuts during the Clinton administration. Over the past eight years, America’s military has become stronger, more agile, and better prepared to confront threats to the American people.

To harden our defense, President Bush:

* Created the Department of Homeland Security;
* Provided national security professionals with vital new tools like the Patriot Act and a program to monitor terrorist communications;
* Reorganized the intelligence community to better meet the needs of the war on terror;
* Deployed aggressive financial measures to freeze terrorist assets; and
* Launched diplomatic initiatives to pressure adversaries and attract new partners to our cause.

While at the US Military Academy recently, President Bush concluded that we are engaged in an ideological struggle and launched an effort to discredit the hateful vision of the extremists and advance the hopeful alternative of freedom. In order to stay a step ahead of our enemies, the Administration transformed our military both to prevail on the battlefields of today and to meet the threats of tomorrow.

He equipped our troops with real-time battlefield intelligence capabilities – unimaginable just a few years ago. In Iraq and Afghanistan, troops in the field have used advanced technologies like Global Positioning Systems to direct airstrikes that take out the enemy while sparing the innocent, and the Administration is arming Predator drones and using them to track down terrorists. When President Bush took office, the United States had fewer than 170 unmanned aerial vehicles. Today, that number has expanded to more than 6,000. That’s 6,000 fewer pilots and gunners that face the potential of getting shot down, which would result in higher casualties.

He more than doubled funding for special operations and created the first-ever special operations command within the Marines. Additionally, he has given the Special Operations Command the lead role in the global war on terror. Under the President’s leadership, the United States has also placed a new focus on counterinsurgency. General David Petraeus wrote a new counterinsurgency manual published by the Army, with central objectives to gain the support of the people and train local forces to take responsibility on their own. The counterinsurgency strategy also stresses the importance of following security gains with real benefits into the daily lives of citizens. Every branch of the military now receives the counterinsurgency training that was once reserved for Special Operations Forces.

We began the most sweeping transformation of America’s global force posture since the end of World War II. Troops are shifting from Cold War garrisons in Europe and Asia, in order to surge more rapidly to troubled spots around the world. President Bush established new military commands to meet challenges unique to Africa and protect the United States. This Administration has also invested more than a half trillion dollars in research and development (money President-elect wants to slash), to build even more advanced capabilities to protect America. U.S. forces are becoming more joint and interoperable, in order to cooperate seamlessly across different services and with foreign partners. Additionally, the Federal Government is cooperating closely with the private sector to improve security in cyberspace to confront an emerging threat to the U.S. economy, defense systems, and citizens.

Under President Bush, the United States went on the offense against the terrorists overseas, rather than wait for our country to be attacked again. Recognizing the need for strong partners, we helped strengthen the counterterrorism capabilities of our allies and made clear that hostile regimes sponsoring terror or pursuing weapons of mass destruction would be held to account. The United States and its allies have applied the full range of our military and intelligence assets to keep pressure on al Qaeda and its affiliates. They have:

* Severely weakened the terrorists;
* Disrupted plots to attack our homeland; and
* Captured or killed hundreds of al Qaeda leaders and operatives in more than two dozen countries, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks.

Recognizing that the only way to defeat the terrorists in the long run is to present an alternative to their hateful ideology, the United States is helping democratic societies emerge as examples for people across the Middle East. President Bush is pressing nations around the world – including our friends – to allow their citizens to have greater freedom of speech, worship, and assembly. Additionally, the Administration is advancing a broader vision of reform that includes economic prosperity, quality health care and education, vibrant civil societies, and women’s rights.

And yet the only thing you hear in the media (and in the comments section from those that disagree with me) is how President Bush is the worst President in history. They say that President Bush led us into an illegal and immoral war. And they said it so many times that people just stopped questioning it. Well, I aim to change that.

For the fourth time, THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!!

7 Comments »

Army Warrior of the Week – PFC Steve Egovail


On Sept. 19, Private 1st Class Steve Egovail was awarded the Soldier’s Medal for actions on March 3, 2008 in Khost Province, Afghanistan.

A Suicide Vehicle Born Improvised Explosive Device detonated 15 meters from the Sabari district Center building, collapsing it on three US Soldiers. PFC Egovail and his crew abruptly halted their fast-rope training when their Black Hawk was diverted for this emergency mission. After dismounting, PFC Egovail and a medic ran toward the mangled building where they first recovered the body of a fallen Soldier. They ran back to the building and began to clear away debris. After 20 minutes, a voice called out. A Soldier lay trapped in a pocket created by several ceiling beams.

Despite the building threatening to collapse, PFC Egovail and the medic continued to clear the rubble and set up car jacks to lift a beam crushing the Soldier’s leg. PFC Egovail then crawled through a small space with an oxygen tank. After two hours of intense effort, rescuers freed the trapped Soldier. PFC Egovail and the medic searched again for the third Soldier, but when they found him, he had already succumbed to his injuries.

For his gallantry in action, PFC Steve Egovail is this week’s Warrior-Soldier.

3 Comments »

Vote of Confidence

sons of iraq

The US has a plan in place to release control over the Sons of Iraq to the Iraqi government. The group was born out of the Al Anbar Awakening that took place in 2006. It was a huge blow to the Al Qaida in Iraq organization and the group tried hard to maintain some sort of legitimacy. General Petraeus said that the uprising has reduced U.S. casualties, increased security, and even saved U.S. taxpayers money. “The savings and vehicles not lost because of reduced violence,” he said in April 2008, “far outweighed the costs of their monthly contracts.” It was a momentous time and the strategy worked perfectly to assist the surge in bringing peace and stability to the nation.

And now, this from MNC-I:

In early November, as U.S. Soldiers looked on, Baghdad-based members of the Sons of Iraq got their monthly paychecks from a new boss: the Iraqi government.

“It was a critical step in the turnover of the mostly Sunni volunteers from Coalition to Iraqi control. And the Baghdad transfer has become a model for similar moves in four other key provinces,” according to Lt. Col. Jeffrey Kulmayer, the chief of reconciliation and engagement for Multi-National Corps – Iraq. “The government is doing the right thing. Baghdad has gone quite well, and we expect that the rest of the provinces will do the same.”

The Sons of Iraq, one of the war’s good-news stories, occupy what Maj. Gen. Michael Ferriter, the deputy commanding General of MNC – I, calls “the leading edge of reconciliation.” A few years ago, many of the group’s members considered Coalition forces their enemies; some fought against U.S. troops and their allies. But in June 2007, armed militiamen in Anbar province found they shared a goal with the Coalition: taking back their neighborhoods from al Qaeda in Iraq. “We helped organize them and eventually began to fund them to provide critical infrastructure and security throughout Anbar,” said Ferriter, “and it quickly spread to many of the other provinces.”

The security situation improved greatly, owing in part to Sons of Iraq tips and operations. Now, Coalition and Iraqi forces are cooperating to integrate approximately 99,000 SoI members across nine provinces into the Iraqi security forces, or provide them with peacetime livelihoods.

“The government will not abandon these people,” said Iraqi Army Maj. Gen. Muzhir al-Mawla, vice chairman of the Iraqi Follow-up Committee for National Reconciliation. “The government will provide employment opportunities for these people … as a reward for their sacrifice and their duties.”

U.S. leaders have dubbed the process “transfer and transition.” First, the SoI troops are transferred to Iraqi control and begin receiving paychecks from the government. Then, the members are given the opportunity to transition into new careers.

Many have begun to join the Iraqi army and police forces, where 20 to 30 percent ultimately will be integrated. The rest can enter a variety of literacy and job-training programs to earn a living in civil service – from banking to auto repair to electrical maintenance. “Those who have a degree will be given government jobs,” said al-Mawla. “Those who do not have much of a degree or any trade can go to a vocational school.”

Early reports on the Baghdad program, which includes over 51,000 SoI members, have been positive and the Iraqi government has followed through on its commitment to pay the SoI salaries. Nearly 2,300 Sons of Iraq from Baghdad have entered training to become police officers; others are signing up for apprenticeship training on Civil Service Corps projects, a New Deal-style employment program, with spots reserved for SoI.

“I feel good and appreciated that I got paid by the Iraqi government,” said Ahmed Kareem Ahmed, a SoI member from Ameriyah in north Baghdad. “I am very happy, very satisfied when I see my neighborhood safe and secure.”
The next provinces to transfer SoI members to Iraqi control are Diyala, Wasit, Babil, and Qadisiya. Sons of Iraq in these provinces will register during the month of December, and the transfer will take place on Jan. 1, 2009. The SoI’s four remaining provinces are slated to complete their transfers in summer 2009.

Kulmayer acknowledge that the program faces several challenges. “Many of the Sons of Iraq were worried that they might not get paid after the Coalition forces gave control to the Government of Iraq,” said Capt. Landgrave Smith, commander of Company D, TF 1st Bn., 63rd Armor Regt.

Further, many SoI leaders have expressed skepticism over how many of their members will be admitted into the Iraqi Army and Police, jobs that are seen as a means to regaining Sunni prestige and political power.

SoI leaders in Diyala province had many of those questions answered in meetings with Coalition and Iraqi leaders Nov. 17 and 19. They were reassured that the government of Iraq was meeting its obligations to SoI members in Baghdad, and would do so across the country as the transfer continued.

“I think it was absolutely critical that the Iraqi government was there to speak directly to their people. It was uncertainty of what was going to happen with the transfer that I think was most worrisome to the SoI,” Kulmayer said.

“The message is so much better received when it comes from your own officials and the leaders that are actually going to take care of you.”

By Adam Weinstein, MNC-I Public Affairs

2 Comments »

Medic Earns Distinguished Service Cross

I just love sharing these stories of real American heroism!!

Dec 04, 2008
BY Don Kramer
Fort Lewis Guardian

The deep boom of an explosion shook the ground and awoke Staff Sgt. Christopher Waiters from sleep on April 5, 2007. The 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division Soldier had bedded down seconds before at the end of a nine-hour guard-duty shift in Old Baqubah, Iraq.

A vehicle-borne improvised explosive device had detonated on a street nearby, engulfing a Bradley Fighting Vehicle and its crew in flames. That insurgent attack led to Waiters, now assigned to Fort Wainwright, Alaska, receiving a Distinguished Service Cross, only the 17th awarded since the war on terrorism began.

The DSC is the Army’s second highest award given for “extraordinary heroism … while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing or foreign force,” according to the Army regulation that governs military awards, AR 600-8-22.

Waiters was a specialist and senior line medic attached to A Company, 5th Battalion, 20th Infantry Regiment. His battalion’s mission was to clear the date palm groves that enveloped the city of Baqubah.

Waiters readied his medical evacuation Stryker vehicle for casualties on the ride to the site of the burning Bradley.

“In the war on terror,” he said, “there are no little wounds. It’s all big stuff. You’re thinking the worst-case scenario. We train our medics that way.”

The medical vehicle drove in tandem with another Stryker including 1st Lt. Timothy Price, the company executive officer. “We pulled around the corner,” Waiters said,
“and the whole street’s on fire. Folks everywhere. People are running. People are shooting.”

The Stryker vehicles pulled up to form a makeshift security perimeter next to a soccer field about 80 meters from the burning Bradley, Price facing west and the MEV east. Both started firing at enemy gunmen. Waiters saw two “trying to hook quick right on me” and engaged them with his M-4 rifle. But his mind was on the Soldiers trapped in a Bradley across the field. He turned to fellow medic, Sgt. Joseph Miller.

“I’m leaving,” he said to his friend.

“You’re not going anywhere,” Miller said.

“I gotta go,” Waiters said. He remembered his friend again warning him as he dropped the ramp of his Stryker and sprinted into the chaos.

“You might not come back,” he heard Miller’s voice behind him.

“All I could think of was burning truck, casualties, American Soldiers injured,” Waiters said.

Price said the after-action-review process determined that the Bradley had been targeted because it straddled a main north-south avenue of approach for the insurgents. The explosion had triggered a complex, three-sided ambush.

“It happened so quick,” Price said. He was talking to Miller as he pulled up to the site in his Stryker, together formulating a plan for suppressing enemy gunmen from multiple directions while getting to the casualties as quickly as possible.

“By this time, Doc was already out of the Stryker, dismounted like a flash and was gone,” Price said. “It was already happening. There was a moment of disbelief. All of the sudden, there he goes, bullets flying down the road. It was one of those surreal moments. Hell, he’s about 10 steps ahead of me, already en route to the casualty.
It was a pretty awesome thing to behold.”

As Waiters dashed into the open street, an insurgent truck came at him through the smoke with its gunner firing. A U.S. .50-caliber machine gun made short work of the vehicle. Waiters dodged the wreckage and sprinted the rest of the 80 meters to the burning Bradley.

“When I got about halfway down the road, you start thinking about things,” he said. “What am I doing? I’m not going to lie to you. I was scared as hell. But part of me just said keep going. I thought, ‘I’m already in hell, might as well keep going.’”

He attracted small arms fire from all directions as he pulled the first American crewman out of the vehicle. Waiters helped him regain his breath in smoke-filled lungs, then wrapped his burned hand. When another Bradley rolled up to help with security, he loaded the wounded Soldier on board and went back to the burning vehicle.

Waiters saw the gunner’s hand snake out of the turret. Despite the flames, he went through the top, grabbed him and pulled out the gunner. He shielded the victim’s body as he dragged him to the same Bradley that helped with the first casualty, getting him to precious oxygen.

As he gasped for breath, the Soldier told Waiters of a third crewman in the crippled Bradley. Without hesitation, the medic turned heel and went back to the vehicle, now almost completely in flames. He tried to get into the turret again, but this time it was hopeless.

“I couldn’t because of all the diesel fuel burning up there,” Waiters said. “I ran around to the back, kicked open the escape hatch and climbed in.”

He saw the arm of the third crewman, but when he grasped it, he realized there was no way the Soldier could have survived. He stepped out to catch his breath and assess, then tried to accomplish his recovery mission of the body.

Suddenly, .25 mm. rounds began cooking off and bouncing around the inside of the vehicle. “I couldn’t breath and I lost sight of the Soldier,” he said.

He struggled to breathe and see. With his clothes charred and the bottoms of his boots melted, he ran back to his vehicle to get a body bag. He returned once more, climbed into the troop compartment and pulled out the deceased crewman.

Soon afterward, another medical team arrived to take control of the scene and Waiters, Miller and crew sped the casualties to the nearest forward operating base for medevac.

Another medic on the scene, Sgt. Jeffrey Anello, said he was shocked when he surveyed the wreckage.

“Seeing the Bradley smoldering and knowing he was able to retrieve two of the Soldiers in it alive, it was amazing,” Anello said. “By the looks of it, nobody should have been alive. We’re very proud of Sergeant Waiters, serving alongside him for three-and-a-half years. It sets a standard for us, of putting others before yourself, to do your job.”

Price said he was awed by Waiters actions that day, but not surprised.

“This wasn’t the first time Doc Waiters put himself in harm’s way to help his boys out,” Price said. “He and Doc Miller went on hundreds of patrols. The guys were always glad to have Doc Waiters and Doc Miller along because they knew they’d do whatever it took to get our guys back.”

Though he has only a single Purple Heart, Waiters survived a number of near misses.

“He got hit in the head once in Buhriz in the helmet, got nicked in the shoulder on patrol with us one night north of Baqubah, had a water bottle shot out from his face earlier in the deployment, and got nicked in the wrist in Old Baqubah,” Price said. “This guy has been in harm’s way many times before this happened. He’s being modest when he says he was just doing his job. The guy is a true hero for what he did.”

No Comments »

$4 Billion in Lost Home Sales

Home sales lowered this week as a result of possible news of a possible Treasury deal. However, potential homeowners are starting to take advantage of the significant decline in prices on homes as well as low interest rates.

This post was published by one of our guest bloggers.

No Comments »

America In Uniform: A Soldier’s Perspective

I found this at BeliefNet thanks to Flag Gazer:

This article is written by a young specialist in the Army. This young man gets what most politicians and journalists did not. A Soldier’s Perspective

Following the article sent about Bush’s national address and troop increase, I thought it was a good idea to let you all know what the perspective is over here. I’m tired of hearing the media’s skewed version, the politicians squabbling over what they read in a report, and the average ill-informed American ranting about things he knows NOTHING about.

I’ve been over here a couple of months now, and I’ve learned more about this country than a year’s worth of watching CNN. I’ve sat in mission briefs with Colonels, talked with village elders, had tea with Sheiks, played with the kids. And I agree with the President. We need more troops and we need to take greater action.

There are 3 major factions here. The Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds. The Shiites are in the majority, but Saddam was a Sunni, so he kept the Shiites in check. Everyone hates the Kurds, who are Christian and in the vast minority. The Kurds received the brunt of Saddam’s murderous tyranny. Now that Saddam is gone, the Shiites have taken control of Baghdad. The largely peaceful Sunnis are now the victims of radical Shiite terrorism. So the young Sunni men, who can no longer go to work and support their families, do what all young men would do. They join the Sunni militia and battle the Shiites. And thus the country sits on the brink of civil war.

But this war is between them. They largely do not concern themselves with the U.S. troops. The insurgents who battle the Coalition Forces are from outside the country. And the biggest problem down here isn’t the insurgents. Its the politicians. The local politicians. Even though the country is controlled by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, downtown Baghdad is controlled by radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr. The Shiites follow al-Sadr and thus the Prime Minister does what al-Sadr says. Think of it as if a warlord controlled New York and blackmailed the President into diplomatic immunity.

When 1st Cav (mainly 2/5 Cav) came here in 2004, they took downtown Baghdad (known as Sadr City) by force. It cost many lives, but after a year, we held an iron grip on the largest insurgent breeding ground in Iraq. The insurgents were afraid of the Horse People, and rightfully so. But when 1st Cav left, al-Sadr influenced the Prime Minister to kick out the Coalition forces from that area of Baghdad. He said the Iraqi military forces could hold the city. But all that happened was al-Sadr regained control of his city, and it is now a heavily guarded fortress. A place where insurgents and terrorists can train and stockpile arms. And we cannot go back in because the Prime Minister won’t let us. Our hands are tied.

So where does al-Sadr get his backing? From Iran and Syria. Iran supplies him with money and Syria supplies the terrorists. The insurgents that battle the Coalition Forces are from Syria, Somalia and dozens of other places outside of Iraq. Iraq is literally a terrorist breeding ground. They have terrorist and sniper schools here. Why not?

They train by teaching them to attack the military forces here. And they have an endless supply of these training tools. They have factories in Sadr City to build bombs. Both Iran and Syria have openly proclaimed their number one goal in life is to destroy the great Western Devil and the little Western Devil (America and Britain). Iran wants to control Iraq to further this purpose. Al-Sadr will get to “run” the country and live like a king, but in reality Iran will pull the puppet strings. Iran will have access to
thousands of radical Shiites who will do whatever al-Sadr tells them to. And Iraq will be used as a breeding ground for terrorism. Terrorism that will be targeted directly at America and Britain. The Iraq Study Group advised we should let Iran and Syria help with rebuilding? Bravo to President Bush for striking that idea down and vowing to keep those two countries out of Iraq.

So how do the Iraqi people feel about everything? Of course they don’t want the Americans here. But they would far rather have us here than the Iranians. My platoon visited an average Sunni village on a patrol a few days ago. Their only source of income was to farm, as they could not go to the city to work for fear of violence. Many of the young men had already run off to join the militia for no other reason than to feed their families. They had no school or hospital near them and the community was dying. The village elders granddaughter was very sick and I was able to treat her. Afterwards he invited me and my Platoon Leader to sit in his house and have tea with him, and we talked about the situation.

The people want peace. The Shiites kill the Sunnis because al-Sadr tells them to do so. The Sunnis fight back because they have no choice. They are glad Saddam is dead (Sunni or not), but do not want to replace him with another dictator in a politician’s clothes (which is what al-Sadr will become). And they especially don’t want Iran in charge. Many innocent Iraqis will die if this happens. These are the words that came out of the elder’s mouth:

“We do not want America here, and America does not want to be here. But you cannot leave because the militias control the country. America must use the might of its giant army and sweep through, root out and destroy the militias. Then Iraq can be free and you can leave.”

What appears to have happened within our diplomatic community, is that Prime Minister finally realizes that his days are numbered. If al-Sadr remains, he will be kicked to the curb. So hopefully he is about to allow us to reenter Sadr City, root out and destroy the enemy. A dramatic troop increase will allow us to do this. And the Horse People are back and ready to finish what
they started over 2 years ago.

If we leave now, it will be a failure for democracy. Iran will control Iraq and the end result will be more terrorist attacks on America. The American people don’t want soldiers dying over here, but its better than American civilians dying over there. Do NOT forget 9/11. They will do it again. The moment we loosen our grip on the noose, they will do it again. And the only way to root out the evil here is to stop beating around the bush, increase troops and destroy the insurgents once and for all. The Iraqi government cannot do this on their own. The Iraqi security forces are inadequate for this task. We are the only ones who can stop al-Sadr.

Feel free to share this with whomever wants a real soldier’s opinion about the war.

SPC “Doc” Shurley
2/5 Cav, 1st CB

4 Comments »

Homefront Hero: Profile Andria, Marine Wife

Home Front Heroes: Profile, Andria

This week I get to introduce you all to a very special Marine wife, Andria. Andria’s husband served in the Marine Corps from 1986 – 2006. She married her husband in 1993, which gives her veteran status as a military wife of 13-years. In those years Andria has lived OCONUS, she has held down the home front during times of separation and is now a mother to a 4-year old darling girl. Below are some questions I asked her during an interview and the answers she shared with me.

I particularly encourage you to read about Andria’s experiences in Japan and how it became a point of strength in her marriage. Although she has never served officially in the military, she most certainly took her role among the “silent ranks” to heart and made a home and family life for herself, her Marine and her daughter. Continue reading this post…

4 Comments »

Divorce And The Military (Well-Researched and Updated)

Note: I originally wrote this and was made aware that I was comparing two completely different statistics, which skewed the numbers. So, while I’m still very upset that none of the articles provide a comparison – good or bad – with the general populace, I’ve decided to go in a different direction with this post. I have suffered through the actual Rand report on the military divorce rate and researched divorce statistics – to the extent available – of the rest of America.

First of all, congrats to VAMC for getting recognized in the NYTimes. Stay tuned to the You Served podcast as we are also planning to have Mr. Long on an upcoming show to discuss military finances at length. But, I digress…

As I was reading through my Huntsville Times newspaper this morning (it was a free subscription that I will NOT be renewing), an article popped off the page at me.

The divorce rate among soldiers and Marines increased last year as military marriages suffered continuing stress from America’s two ongoing wars. There were an estimated 10,200 failed marriages in the active duty Army and 3,077 among Marines, according to figures obtained by The Associated Press for the budget year ended Sept. 30.

That’s a divorce rate of 3.5 percent among more than 287,000 married troops in the Army, up from 3.3 percent in the previous fiscal year, according to Defense Department figures.

Any divorce is terrible and an increase to any demographic should be looked at as distressing. After all, marriage is a holy institution between a man and woman – yes, a MAN and WOMAN (these views are my own and do not reflect the views of YouServed.com or its parent company VAMortgageCenter.com). Marriage is something that requires work. Stress, money and other factors heavily play into the success or failure of marriage, but the biggest key to a long, happy, healthy marriage is selflessness, love, and devotion. People need to remember the reasons they got married to begin with and learn to work through each other’s weaknesses and failures.

First of all, the article claims that the dual wars and stresses placed on the military are to blame for the rise in divorces. In fact, the research report says “data from the past ten years of service personnel records provide little support for either of these predictions.” There’s no question that stress and deployment could be blamed for some divorces, but those very same issues could be blamed for keeping some marriages together. It’s no secret that a deployment will affect a marriage one way or another. However, it’s not always negative. In many instances, a deployment has actually strengthened a marriage. I happen to think it definitely strengthened mine and I’ve talked to other Soldiers with similar feelings.

Something else none of these articles talk about is the fact that current divorce rates have arrived at the levels they were at back in 1996 – when we weren’t at war!

One of the points of the article is that stress from long deployments plays a big role in the divorce rate in the military. In fact the report itself says the stress hypothesis is only accurate for active duty members of the Air Force. They’re not used to being away from a remote control or comfortable recliner for so many months at a time (those comments were strangely absent in the actual report). According to the report,

In that service, among enlisted members and officers, the more days that married service members spent deployed, the greater their risk of dissolving their marriages after they returned. In no other service could we observe the predicted effect of time deployed on risk of dissolution. On the contrary, for enlisted members in the active Army, Navy, and Marines, and for officers in the active Navy and Marines, the longer that a service member is deployed while married, the lower the subsequent risk of marital dissolution.

So, if the report said exactly that, why did the AP report that “long and repeated deployments required of many troops have been widely blamed for unprecedented stresses on military couples”? I mean, bloody hell, directly under the section titled “Understanding the Effects of Military Service and
Deployment on Military Marriages” we find this:

Despite the demonstrable stresses associated with military service and deployment and the widespread assumption that these stresses lead to the deterioration of military marriages, our analyses revealed little support for the stress hypothesis.

But, what bothers me the most is not what is IN the article, but what is missing from it: perspective. What perspective is missing from this article? How about the national divorce rate compared to the military divorce rate. Where is this in the article? Why wouldn’t they contrast the fact that the military is actually a pretty family-friendly place to be married? There is absolutely NO mention of the national statistics anywhere in the article. In all the reports I’ve read, the civilian divorce rate is actually very similar at 3.8%. Maybe it’s just as stressful to be at Wal-Mart as it is to be at war?!

The report does provide an out for people like me that question why there isn’t a comparison:

To help evaluate research on military marriages, researchers are often requested to compare results obtained with military samples to results obtained with comparable civilian samples. Fulfilling such requests is not straightforward, however, because there is no consensus among researchers about the dimensions on which military and civilian samples might be comparable. The best practices for conducting these comparisons are worthy of direct attention.

I have another question no one seems to asking. What is rate of divorce among the different lengths of marriage within the military? In other words, what is the divorce rate among Soldiers married more than ten years prior to combat and those married less than ten years (or something along those lines)? I would think that young blossoming relationships would be more strained under current conditions that established marriages. Or actually the other way around.

One of the findings of this study that may lend some possible answers is that military men tended to marry younger than their civilian counterparts and have children younger as well. Deployments also tend to hasten Soldiers into marriage to ensure that a boyfriend or girlfriend is taken care of in case of death, not thinking about the long-term prospects of being married to someone they may not have married otherwise. I’ve seen many Soldiers marry within weeks or months of dating someone simply because they were deploying. The relationship wasn’t necessarily a monogamous one to begin with and now the Soldier is away for a year to 15 months. None of this is discussed in the media either.

Instead, our beloved mainstream media wants you to think that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as all of our other commitments around the world, are causing Soldiers to get divorced. So what is the rest of America’s excuse? Perhaps we should force more people into the military and actually protect marriage!!

Don’t get me wrong – I know that the military is a stressful life and deployment DO play a role in some individuals getting a divorce. However, I’m also a realist who recognizes that the number of “Quick Divorces – $179!” signs outside the gates of Fort Stewart BEFORE the war. My issue is with the contempt for the military and any point the media can make in opposing the war. When it comes to reporting, I expect more unbiased FACTS!

7 Comments »

VA Mortgage Center.com Featured in the New York Times

VA Mortgage Center.com, YouServed.com’s parent company, the folks who have helped bring together the amazing milbloggers featured here and helped launch the You Served podcast, have enjoyed their own time of recognition this week in the New York Times.

New York Times on VAMC
Company CEO Nathan Long is quoted numerous times on the Times’ Real Estate blog area, explaining the unique benefits veterans and active duty military members have when it comes to home financing. To all our readers out there – the VA Loan Program is the absolute best option for home buyers left on the market!

Read the feature on NYTimes’ site or check out the official VA Mortgage Center.com release on the news.

One thing we set out to do when launching You Served was to keep our readers informed of their VA Benefits. For all the good things that are out there for you to take advantage of, the stats show that awareness of these programs is alarmingly low. Know what you qualify for! Contact your rep with the VA, contact the local/regional VA office, and stay up-to-date!

Thanks for reading along with us, CJ, Troy, Claire and the rest. And congrats to VAMC!

1 Comment »

Copyright 2007-2010. You Served®. VA Mortgage Center.com® is NOT affiliated with any government agencies, including the VA; However, VA Mortgage Center.com has relationships with VA mortgage specialists. These specialists are VA-approved lenders, but they are NOT affiliated with any government agencies, including the VA. We may share customer information with our trusted affiliates to assist you with your VA loan.